Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Why Leopold and Loeb Committed Cold-Blooded Murder in the ‘Crime of the Century’


Recommended Posts



Why Leopold and Loeb Committed Cold-Blooded ******* in the ‘****** of the Century’

When

This is the hidden content, please
was 14 years old, he delivered an impassioned indictment of capital punishment during a school debate competition,
This is the hidden content, please
that “only **** is permitted to take human life.” Asked whether this stance contradicted the principle of “an eye for an eye,” he
This is the hidden content, please
, “Punishment should be reformative, never vindictive.”

Franks’ rhetoric impressed the contest’s judges, who declared his team the winner. Just two weeks later, the debate champion would be *****, the victim of a ******* that captivated the nation and raised lasting questions about the very issue that Franks had just debated.

On the afternoon of May 21, 1924, Franks came across 18-year-old

This is the hidden content, please
, an acquaintance he sometimes played tennis with, while walking home from school in Chicago. Loeb offered Franks a ride in his car, but the boy declined, as he was just a
This is the hidden content, please
from his destination. “Come on,” Loeb reportedly
This is the hidden content, please
. “I want to talk to you about the tennis racket you had yesterday. I want to get one for my brother.” Franks relented.

The next morning, a Polish immigrant found Franks’ ***** body stuffed into a drainage culvert about ten miles away. Far from a whodunit, Loeb and 19-year-old

This is the hidden content, please
confessed to the ******* ten days later, after they became leading suspects. In police interviews, both men admitted the ****** was committed merely for the
This is the hidden content, please
.

A newspaper article about Franks’ ******* by Leopold and Loeb

The New York World

Newspapers at the time offered a range of alternative theories for the grisly *******, from the young men’s privileged upbringing to their

This is the hidden content, please
to their college curriculums. As
This is the hidden content, please
, author of
This is the hidden content, please
and the creator of a
This is the hidden content, please
dedicated to the case, says, the public started seeking answers to recurring questions: “Why did this happen? How could these people have turned into this? … Anything you wanted to blame [the *******] on, you could blame it on.”

Thanks in large part to nonstop media coverage, the relatively straightforward hearing (Leopold and Loeb pled guilty, so they didn’t face a trial by jury) became a mirror for the anxieties of the 1920s, allowing observers to attribute the ****** to whatever they perceived as society’s ills. This fascination

This is the hidden content, please
a century later.

“The reason that this case continues to grab people when there have been so many other sensational murders is that the motive just has never been comprehensible to anybody else,” says

This is the hidden content, please
, author of
This is the hidden content, please
. “Nobody has ever understood why two well-educated, privileged boys with a great future ahead of them … would think the most fun thing they could do on a spring afternoon would be to ******* a **** from the neighborhood.”

Plotting the imperfect ******

Born into

This is the hidden content, please
*******
This is the hidden content, please
in Chicago in 1904 and 1905, respectively,
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
were afforded every opportunity throughout their youth. Both were precocious students, with Leopold demonstrating a penchant for languages and ornithology, and Loeb preferring literature and history. Though the two grew up in the same neighborhood (as did their victim, Franks), they only became friends in spring 1920. The following February, the pair’s friendship turned *******, “and they also started committing ******* together,” says Rebain. “You see this escalation in their relationship,” from
This is the hidden content, please
to arson to perhaps even
This is the hidden content, please
.

Loeb was the “gregarious and sociable” foil to Leopold’s “misanthropic and aloof” personality,

This is the hidden content, please
historian
This is the hidden content, please
in
This is the hidden content, please
. Though scholars generally agree that Loeb was the instigator of these *******, some place more of the blame on
This is the hidden content, please
. Loeb “seems to have had a big fantasy world in which he was rebelling against his parents,” says Barrett. “Instead of becoming the perfect, well-dressed, rich attorney they wanted him to be … he was becoming the opposite of that: the secret bandit, *******, lawbreaker.”

Loeb (left) was the “gregarious and sociable” foil to Leopold’s (right) “misanthropic and aloof” personality, writes historian Simon Baatz in For the Thrill of It: Leopold, Loeb and the ******* That Shocked Jazz Age Chicago.

This is the hidden content, please

Leopold was more interested in lawbreaking as an

This is the hidden content, please
demonstrating his superiority. He was also eager to maintain his romantic relationship with Loeb, sometimes promising to act as an accomplice in exchange for ****.

In November 1923, the pair

This is the hidden content, please
Loeb’s former fraternity house at the University of Michigan. Leopold wanted to rob a second house, too, but Loeb was reluctant. Neither heist was particularly successful, and the friends fought bitterly on their drive back to Chicago. Ultimately, they agreed to carry out a kidnapping, ransom and ******* scheme that would prove their genius and cement their bond at a pivotal moment in their relationship. Leopold was set to depart for Europe soon, and Loeb was eager to stall their separation.

The duo

This is the hidden content, please
involving false identities with elaborate backstories and decoy bank accounts, a wad of cash thrown out the window of a moving train, and a ******** method that would leave both equally culpable for taking a life. (They later abandoned the idea of strangling the victim with a rope, each pulling on one end until he was *****, but that didn’t stop Alfred Hitchcock from
This is the hidden content, please
the ******* ******* in
This is the hidden content, please
, his 1948 thriller inspired by the case.)

Though the pair initially considered ******** a former friend of Loeb’s, they decided to instead target a young boy, as he would presumably be easier to overpower and more likely to be unsupervised than a girl of the same age. The victim had to be wealthy enough to ensure his family could pay the ransom, and he had to live nearby so the killers could observe the mayhem their actions had provoked without attracting suspicion.

Rope (1948) Official Trailer #1 – Alfred Hitchcock Movie

The ******* of Bobby Franks

Beyond this criteria, Leopold and Loeb left their choice of victim “completely up to chance,” says Rebain. Though they’d written up a list of

This is the hidden content, please
and almost selected a different boy, they ended up taking “the most likely looking subject that came our way,” as Leopold
This is the hidden content, please
authorities. Though it took some convincing by Loeb for Franks to join them in the rented automobile, he did so, then greeted Leopold, whom he’d never met before.

The killers’ accounts of what happened next are generally in agreement, aside from one main point of contention: Both

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
named the other as the one who dealt Franks the fatal *****, hitting him over the head with a taped chisel multiple times before stuffing a rag down his throat. (The general consensus now is that Loeb committed the ******* while Leopold drove the car.)

After Franks was *****, the pair drove some distance away, stripped the corpse of its clothing (but didn’t ****** it in any other way) and waited until night fell, passing time by stopping for sandwiches and root *****. Under cover of darkness, they doused Franks’ body in hydrochloric acid to mask his identity, then hid the boy in a culvert near the Indiana border, in an area where Leopold sometimes went birding. On their way home, they mailed a typewritten

This is the hidden content, please
demanding $10,000 in cash and called the Franks, telling their victim’s mother that her son “has been kidnapped [but] is safe.”

The carefully constructed scheme quickly fell apart from there.

Bobby Franks’ father, Joseph (right), and older brother, Jack (left)

This is the hidden content, please

Bobby Franks

This is the hidden content, please

The ransom

This is the hidden content, please
, which arrived the following morning, advised the Franks family to “remain at home” after 1 p.m. and ensure “the telephone is not in use,” as the killers would provide further instructions via phone. But by the time Leopold and Loeb enacted the next step of their plan, the body had already been found. The hydrochloric acid had done little to disfigure the corpse. Newspapers covered the discovery of an unknown boy’s ********, announcing his
This is the hidden content, please
as Franks—the son of a “retired millionaire manufacturer”—that same day.

The men had hoped Franks’ body would never be found, or at least not until decomposition had set in. The ********’ rapid recovery prevented the pair from collecting the ransom.

Over the following week, local and national papers alike speculated on the *******’s motive (the

This is the hidden content, please
theorized that a ******* predator had “sought to cloak his act and the boy’s presumed accidental ****** by the demands for money,” while the
This is the hidden content, please
posited that Franks had ***** while fighting off his kidnappers) and character (only a “scholarly person, a master of English,” could have written a ransom letter with such “faultless” grammar, according to the Tribune).

Another flaw in the plan came about when, in the killers’ haste to hide the body in the culvert, Leopold’s

This is the hidden content, please
fell out of his pocket. This unassuming accessory proved to be
This is the hidden content, please
to the investigation. It had a unique hinge that was only available through a single Chicago supplier. That company, in turn, had sold just three pairs of glasses featuring the patented technology. One belonged to a woman, while another was sold to a lawyer who was traveling in Europe at the time of the *******. The third belonged to Leopold, who readily supplied an alibi: He’d spent the day of the ******* with his friend Loeb, driving around town before picking up a pair of young women.

Though Loeb presented a slightly different version of events, he soon changed his story to match up with Leopold’s, convincing the authorities—however briefly—of the

This is the hidden content, please
. But as investigators kept digging, they uncovered two damning pieces of evidence: Leopold’s maid had recently seen a typewriter like the one used to write the ransom note, though it had since disappeared from the family home. And Leopold and Loeb couldn’t have spent the day driving around in Leopold’s car, as his chauffeur was making repairs to it at the time. Confronted with these inconsistencies, Loeb
This is the hidden content, please
to the ******** early on the morning of May 31. Leopold made a similar statement shortly after.

Mugshots of Leopold (top) and Loeb (bottom)

This is the hidden content, please

Leopold in a cell at Stateville Penitentiary

This is the hidden content, please

The duo believed themselves to be “

This is the hidden content, please
” whose superior intellect placed them above the law. The *******, then, was a test of sorts, offering Leopold and Loeb a chance to prove their mettle by committing the perfect ******. But the plan’s spectacular ******** only underscored their naïveté and immaturity.

“They planned some things so thoroughly, like making these false identifications and registering in different hotels and banks and all this background stuff that didn’t end up mattering at all,” says Rebain. “What got them were these little things that they just didn’t think about enough.”

The “trial of the century” that wasn’t a trial at all

Prosecutor

This is the hidden content, please
was
This is the hidden content, please
Leopold and Loeb. The public was similarly eager to punish these rich upstarts, who expressed little remorse for their actions. “We were experimenting” to commit the perfect ******, Leopold
This is the hidden content, please
. “The ******** was accidental and incidental. But it is as easy to justify such a ****** as it is to justify an entomologist impaling a beetle on a pin.”

As Crowe prepared to mount a case against the killers, their families sought out the best attorney money could buy: Clarence Darrow, who’d made a name for himself as a labor lawyer and would soon achieve great fame through his defense both of Leopold and Loeb and of

This is the hidden content, please
, the teacher at the center of the 1925 Scopes “monkey trial.” According to a
This is the hidden content, please
of Darrow, a group led by Loeb’s uncle knocked on the Chicago-based attorney’s door in the early morning hours of June 2 and begged him to “save our two boys. … Get them a life sentence instead of a ****** sentence.” Darrow, a
This is the hidden content, please
of the ****** penalty, agreed to
This is the hidden content, please
.

Clarence Darrow, defense attorney for Leopold and Loeb

This is the hidden content, please

A newspaper article about the key figures in the Franks case

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
underwent extensive physical and
This is the hidden content, please
while awaiting trial—a fact that led many observers, including the prosecution team, to believe that Darrow would argue they were not guilty by reason of insanity. Instead, the attorney changed the
This is the hidden content, please
to guilty.

Darrow’s shift in strategy reflected his belief that Judge

This is the hidden content, please
, who had a reputation as one of the court’s more ******** justices, would find it much ******* to order the executions of two teenagers than a jury of ****** Chicagoans would. By pleading guilty, Leopold and Loeb would not be judged by a dozen of their peers, but by one judge in a sentencing hearing. “I know perfectly well that where responsibility is divided by 12, it is easy to say, ‘Away with him,’” the attorney
This is the hidden content, please
in court. “But, your honor, if these boys hang, you must do it. There can be no division of responsibility.”

In making his decision, Darrow urged Caverly to consider three mitigating factors: the pair’s youth, their guilty plea and their mental state. Leopold and Loeb may not have been insane, the defense argued, but they were certainly mentally ill, plagued by “emotional immaturity, obsessions with ****** and

This is the hidden content, please
, alcohol ******, glandular abnormalities, and ******* longings and insecurities,” writes
This is the hidden content, please
, a historian at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, on his Famous Trials
This is the hidden content, please
.

Psychiatrists detailed the killers’ childhood trauma, much of it inflicted by

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
. Loeb’s governess pushed the young boy to excel academically and discouraged him from socializing with other children, while Leopold’s “seduced him when he was still a child,” writes Baatz. “The damage inflicted on each boy at an early age had resulted in compensatory fantasies that led directly to the *******.”

The president of the ********* Psychiatric Association,

This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
that Leopold and Loeb “complemented each other,” arguing that neither would never have committed the ****** on his own. But the experts called to the stand by the prosecution offered a different perspective. Based on physical examinations of Leopold and Loeb, one neurologist said he had found no evidence of “any defect, any disorder, any lack of development or any ********.” The fact that two sets of psychiatrists came to entirely different conclusions led some observers to discount all of the expert testimony: Few realized that “each side spoke for a different branch of psychiatry”—the prosecution for neurology and the defense for psychoanalysis—“and was, therefore, separately justified in reaching its verdict,” writes Baatz.

Crowe and Darrow, the

This is the hidden content, please
on either side of the case, also presented wildly varied portraits of the killers. The prosecutor referred to Leopold and Loeb as “cowardly perverts,” “snakes,” “spoiled smart alecks” and “**** dogs,” calling particular attention to the ******* nature of their relationship. “Leopold was willing to go along with Loeb because he could use his body for vile and unnatural practices,” Crowe
This is the hidden content, please
. As remorseless killers who had taken a life in cold blood, the two deserved the ****** penalty, in his view.

Leopold and Loeb (second row) in court

New York Daily News via Getty Images

Darrow, on the other hand,

This is the hidden content, please
that “these two very privileged sons of very wealthy families were actually victims,” said author
This is the hidden content, please
in a
This is the hidden content, please
about the case. “They were in this very sheltered life with cold families, and … they should be pitied rather than hated.”

The defense attorney traced the ******* to the killers’ childhoods, arguing that their past experiences had

This is the hidden content, please
the decisions they made as teenagers. “Somewhere in the infinite processes that go to the making up of the boy or the man, something slipped,” Darrow said. As a result, Leopold and Loeb could not be held fully responsible for their actions. Inflicting the ****** penalty on them would achieve nothing beyond satisfying the public’s bloodlust.

On August 23, approximately a month after the sentencing hearing began, Darrow

This is the hidden content, please
a
This is the hidden content, please
that demonstrated both “his eloquence [and] his wit,” according to Barrett. Often appealing directly to the judge, Darrow used Leopold and Loeb’s case as a jumping-off point for a broader criticism of the ****** penalty. “We can learn, by reason and judgment and understanding and ******, that all life is worth saving, and that mercy is the highest attribute of man,” he said in the final minutes of his summation.

Crowe, in his closing arguments a few days later,

This is the hidden content, please
by claiming that Caverly would put his “official seal of approval upon [Darrow’s] doctrines of anarchy” if he declined to sentence Leopold and Loeb to ******.

A newspaper’s illustrations of the Franks case

This is the hidden content, please

Caverly took nearly two weeks to reach a decision. When the court reconvened on September 10, the judge

This is the hidden content, please
the lawyers’ “careful analysis” of Leopold and Loeb’s mental state and life histories as a “valuable contribution to criminology.” Still, despite the voluminous testimony provided by experts on both sides, Caverly’s decision ultimately came down to one chief consideration: the defendants’ youth. Instead of sending the pair to the gallows, he sentenced them to life imprisonment for ******* and an additional 99 years each for kidnapping. Though Leopold and Loeb might welcome their reprieve from hanging, the judge pointed out that “the prolonged suffering of years of confinement may well be the severest form of retribution and expiation.”

Life plus 99 years

The public had

This is the hidden content, please
the story from the time of Franks’ kidnapping to the killers’ sentencing. Newspapers covered every development in the case, portraying Leopold and Loeb as “gentleman gangsters” at a time when
This is the hidden content, please
for its mob activity, says Barrett. Everyone had an opinion on the pair’s motive: Editorials argued that if Leopold and Loeb had performed “physical labor as children, they wouldn’t have done this,” Rebain says. Other observers believed they’d been “overeducated” and shouldn’t have studied philosophy. Even the Ku Klux Klan
This is the hidden content, please
, citing the friends’
This is the hidden content, please
as a reason for their depravity. In response to such criticism, ******* rabbis pointed out that Leopold and Loeb were self-proclaimed atheists divorced from
This is the hidden content, please
.

On one front, however, the public was largely *******: Leopold and Loeb should pay for their ******* with their lives, and the fact that they’d only received a prison sentence was a direct reflection of their money and privilege. People believed that “a poor defendant who couldn’t afford Darrow and all these psychiatrists … would just be hanged,” Rebain says. “They wouldn’t have any chance.” Others feared that ****** would increase “because people think they can get away with anything.”

Historians generally agree that Loeb murdered Franks while Leopold drove the rental car.

Hulton Archive / Getty Images

As for the three families at the heart of the case, none was particularly pleased with its outcome. Grateful as they were that Leopold and Loeb would not be hanged, the killers’ loved ones had to contend with the fact that these young men who had once shown such promise would now spend the rest of their lives in prison. The

This is the hidden content, please
, for their part, were ready to be out of the spotlight and able to grieve in peace.

“I always have seen [the case] as this sort of Shakespearean drama about these three families, [who] were all immigrants to America and had pursued the ********* dream,” says Barrett. The ******* “basically ruined those families for generations,” she adds. It’s “a really tragic morality tale” about the limits of wealth and influence.

After the sentencing hearing wrapped up, Leopold and Loeb were

This is the hidden content, please
in Illinois’ state prison in
This is the hidden content, please
. Leopold was transferred to the Stateville Penitentiary the following year, while Loeb remained at Joliet until 1930, when he reunited with his friend at Stateville. Initially, “they were in a lot of danger,” says Rebain. “Because they were 19, they were very young to be going to an ****** prison. And because of the nature of their ****** and the rumors about their sexuality … they were very much targets for ********.”

Both eventually adjusted to life in prison, particularly under the less restrictive conditions at Stateville, where they were “as close as it is possible for two men to be,” Leopold

This is the hidden content, please
in his autobiography. They collaborated to open a correspondence high school at the prison and often played handball and bridge together. Then, on January 28, 1936,
This is the hidden content, please
by the name of James Day attacked Loeb in the prison shower, slashing him more than 50 times with a razor. “I think I’m going to make it,” Loeb reportedly
This is the hidden content, please
his doctors; Leopold, who’d rushed to his friend’s side after learning of the *******, offered to
This is the hidden content, please
to Loeb but was turned down. Loeb ***** soon after at 30 years old.

Leopold (right) and Loeb (left) in prison in 1924

Bettmann via Getty Images

Though

This is the hidden content, please
claimed he’d acted in self-defense, fending off a ******* proposition by a razor-wielding Loeb, this explanation didn’t hold up to scrutiny, as Day suffered no injuries during the encounter and was the one who’d brought the ******* to the shower in the first place. A jury later
This is the hidden content, please
of Loeb’s *******—a verdict that Rebain says was influenced by homophobia and lingering resentment of the victim’s earlier ******.

The ******* sent Leopold, who

This is the hidden content, please
Loeb both “my best pal” and “the greatest ****** I have ever had, for my friendship with him had cost me my life,” into a deep depression. It was only during World War II, when he volunteered for
This is the hidden content, please
conducted at the prison, that he found a
This is the hidden content, please
. This verve for life happened to coincide with Leopold’s first opportunity to apply for parole, which was denied in
This is the hidden content, please
amid intense public backlash but granted in
This is the hidden content, please
.

Leopold was released from prison on March 13, 1958, at age 53, after serving 33 years of his sentence. Eager to avoid the spotlight, he moved to Puerto Rico, where he’d received an offer of employment as a

This is the hidden content, please
. While living abroad, Leopold earned a master’s degree in social work; married a
This is the hidden content, please
; conducted medical research; and revisited his interest in ornithology, even publishing a
This is the hidden content, please
on the region’s birds. He ***** of a heart ******* on August 29, 1971, at age 66.

A 1958 magazine cover featuring Leopold

This is the hidden content, please

Rebain decided to write his

This is the hidden content, please
of Leopold after realizing that most accounts of the *******’s life dedicate just a few sentences to his experiences after parole. Diving into the
This is the hidden content, please
, he found sources that contradicted the popular perception of Leopold as “the lesser of two evils, just a shy **** who had a crush on the wrong guy.”

In truth, says Rebain, Leopold’s correspondence paints him as a social, assertive figure who was “absolutely not letting anyone tell him what to do.” He

This is the hidden content, please
about violating parole restrictions against alcohol use, among other individual freedoms, and, in a letter to one of the attorneys who’d helped secure his release, claimed that he’d “visited most of the better whorehouses, cheap bars and gambling casinos in Greater San Juan.”

Casual observers often cited Leopold’s case as an example of the power of rehabilitation. After his ******, Puerto Rican Governor Luis A. Ferré even

This is the hidden content, please
that “the story of Nathan Leopold is one that must confirm the ****** and intrinsic goodness of the human being.” But Rebain’s research suggests the ******* wasn’t as reformed as many thought.

The Shocking ********* Case of Leopold and Loeb (Full Documentary)

In the decades since the “

This is the hidden content, please
,” Leopold and Loeb’s story has
This is the hidden content, please
countless
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
and other adaptations. Reflecting on the case’s enduring appeal, Barrett points out that in 1924, the public was hungry for a kind of “tawdry sensationalism. Even though there were murders galore in Chicago … there wasn’t a ******* among the rich people who should know better.” Today, says Rebain, the story contains “so many elements for people to latch onto, so even if you’re not interested in one aspect, you’re going to be interested in another,” whether it’s class, sexuality, religion or psychology.

Often forgotten in discussions of Leopold and Loeb is their victim,

This is the hidden content, please
. “He was a really smart ****,” Barrett says, and he showed “as much promise” as his precocious killers did. The author cites an anecdote shared by Franks’ father, who told reporters that his wife kept a copy of Franks’ winning argument against the ****** penalty in a box. Sometimes, she’d take the paper out and remind herself that her son wouldn’t have wanted his killers to hang for his ******. “That was a source of comfort to her,” Barrett says. “The layers of tragedy in that, the amount of empathy in that one comment, is missing from anything Leopold and Loeb ever said, [and] it just kind of sums up why this is as big a tragedy as it is.”

Get the latest History stories in your inbox?







This is the hidden content, please

********* History, ******, ******, Immigrants, Journalism, Judaism, Law, Media, *******, Mysteries, Newspapers, Psychology, Trending Today
#Leopold #Loeb #Committed #ColdBlooded #******* #****** #Century

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.