US voters speak many languages, but non-English campaigning remains risky for Harris and Trump

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

US voters speak many languages, but non-English campaigning ******** risky for Harris and Trump



Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Tim Walz

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Mandarin. But don’t expect to hear Kamala Harris’ running mate deploying his ******** language skills on the US election campaign trail.

While languages are inextricably interlinked with identity, they are also becoming a political hot potato. In February, Donald Trump

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that migrants “have languages that nobody in this country has ever heard of. It’s a very horrible thing.”

And J.D. Vance, now Trump’s own vice-presidential pick, last year

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

an “English Language Unity Act” to make English the official language of the ******* States.

Despite the potential electoral advantages of campaigning in multiple languages, the risks of alienating sections of the voting public mean candidates are wary of going too far.

Monolingual politics

English-speaking countries are now home to enormous linguistic diversity, driven by decades of immigration. Around one in five Americans speak a language other than English at home. This proportion has more than doubled since 1980, according to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

The percentages are similar in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, while in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, 23% of people have a mother ******* other than the official languages of English and French. In the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, the share of non-English native speakers is smaller—roughly 10%—but the upward trend is the same.

Despite these demographic shifts, however, election campaigns remain largely monolingual affairs. For example, there is little obvious sign of non-English messages in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

uploaded to the Open Elections crowdsourcing website for the recent British election.

Exceptions largely prove the rule. For instance, in July, *********** Senator Ted Cruz

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

a US$4.4 million Spanish-language campaign targeted at Hispanic voters—but only in Texas.

In New Zealand, the Labor Party

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

its 2023 campaign slogan “In it for you” into the Māori language: “Māu, Mā Tātou.” But in practice the Māori version was used only sparingly, such as in the annual

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that fell during the campaign *******.

Majority rules

The reluctance to engage in multilingual campaigning might seem surprising. After all, modern political parties frequently resemble businesses, competing for votes in the election marketplace.

In theory, they would have much to gain by speaking to voters—their customers—in their preferred tongues. As former ******* Chancellor ****** Brandt

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

: “If I am selling to you, I speak your language. If I am buying, dann müssen Sie Deutsch sprechen.”

The reluctance of parties to mount multilingual campaigns is probably driven by one major factor: they believe it would cost them votes overall. Indeed, research suggests multilingual campaigning runs the risk of turning off majority language voters.

For instance, a 2022 ********* study found over 90% of French speakers in Quebec were annoyed by English-only campaign signs. A 2018

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

came to similar conclusions, with monolingual English speakers becoming more hostile to candidates who ran campaign ads in Spanish.

Still, such attitudes are not necessarily set in stone. After all, legislatures themselves have undergone rapid shifts as parties reflect more diverse societies in their candidate selection.

Some

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the British House of Commons now come from ******* minorities, up from just 2% in 2005. And in Washington,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

now identify as non-white, double the share of 20 years ago.

The picture is similar in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, while ******* minorities—including Māori—now make up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of New Zealand’s parliament.

AI translation

Of course, change is not always easy. As things stand, few major parties in the Anglosphere even make their main websites available in a language other than English. And

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

released in June showed just 68% of all US voters were comfortable with people speaking a language other than English in public.

But the risks must be set against the potential rewards. Many of the key

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the 2024 US campaign are becoming more and more diverse. Around

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, and 10% in Georgia, are Hispanic. Battleground state Michigan is home to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

speakers in the US, with 190,000 living in the Detroit metro area alone.

It is true that multilingualism can be complex and costly. AI solutions and algorithm-driven micro-targeting could be partial solutions—if used wisely.

Lessons might be drawn from India’s recent election campaign, where the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) used AI to rapidly translate Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s campaign messages from Hindi into the country’s many other languages.

Ultimately, the chief potential benefit of genuine, two-way multilingual communication ***** in its ability to help political parties understand and address the needs of more diverse populations.

Today, multilingual campaigning in English-speaking countries ******** rare. But in a tight campaign, it could provide a crucial edge.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
US voters speak many languages, but non-English campaigning ******** risky for Harris and Trump (2024, August 22)
retrieved 22 August 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#voters #speak #languages #nonEnglish #campaigning #******** #risky #Harris #Trump

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/