Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Citigroup whistleblower denied share of $400 million penalty


Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member

This is the hidden content, please

Citigroup whistleblower denied share of $400 million penalty

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A federal appeals court on Tuesday said a Citigroup (C) vice president was not entitled to a share of a $400 million civil fine that the bank agreed to pay in October 2020 over its risk management failures.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said Tamika Miller did not show that her whistleblowing over Citigroup’s alleged altering of audit reports obligated the bank to pay a penalty, leading to its settlement with the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Miller said Citigroup’s conduct violated its $700 million settlement in 2015 with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau over its credit card business, and its $35 million settlement the same day with the OCC over its marketing practices.

However, Circuit Judge Denny *****, writing for a three-judge panel, said that federal law gave the OCC discretion, but not an obligation, to fine Citigroup over the audit reports. He said that doomed Miller’s accusation that the third-largest U.S. bank hid its compliance failures to avoid a fine that the government was entitled to collect.

***** also said that the lawsuit by Miller, a Citigroup risk management employee since 2014, was “bereft of the details needed to provide Citibank with ‘fair notice’ of her claim, and instead resembles an attempt to use the litigation process to discover hypothetical wrongdoing.”

Lawyers for Miller did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Citigroup did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Miller sued under the federal False Claims Act, which lets whistleblowers sue on behalf of the government and share in recoveries, typically 15% to 30%.

Such cases typically argue that companies received money they weren’t entitled to. Miller’s case was a “reverse false claim” contending that Citigroup kept money it should have paid.

Jane Fraser, Citigroup’s chief executive, has made cleaning up the New York-based bank’s regulatory failings a top priority since taking over in March 2021.

The case is U.S. ex rel Miller v Citibank NA, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-1615.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)



This is the hidden content, please

#Citigroup #whistleblower #denied #share #million #penalty

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.