Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member



Why this is terrible for democracy

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Meta’s

This is the hidden content, please
and Threads apps are “slowly” rolling out a change that will
This is the hidden content, please
by default. The company defines political content broadly as being “potentially related to things like laws, elections, or social topics.”

Users who follow accounts that post political content will still see such content in the normal, algorithmically sorted ways. But by default, users will not see any political content in their feeds, stories or other places where new content is recommended to them.

For users who want political recommendations to remain,

This is the hidden content, please
has a new setting where users can turn it back on, making this an “opt-in” feature.

This change not only signals Meta’s retreat from politics and news more broadly, but also challenges any sense of these platforms being good for democracy at all. It’s also likely to have a chilling effect, stopping content creators from engaging politically altogether.

Politics: Dislike

Meta has long had a problem with politics, but that wasn’t always the case.

In 2008 and 2012, political campaigning

This is the hidden content, please
, and
This is the hidden content, please
was seen as especially important in Barack Obama’s success. The ***** Spring was painted as a social-media-led “
This is the hidden content, please
Revolution,” although
This is the hidden content, please
’s role in these events was
This is the hidden content, please
,

However, since then the specter of political manipulation in the wake of the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal has soured social media users toward politics on platforms.

Increasingly polarized politics, vastly increased mis- and disinformation online, and Donald Trump’s preference for social media over policy, or truth, have all taken a toll. In that context, Meta has already been reducing

This is the hidden content, please
on their main
This is the hidden content, please
platform since 2021.

This is the hidden content, please
and Threads hadn’t been limited in the same way, but also ran into problems. Most recently, the Human Rights Watch
This is the hidden content, please
in December last year of systematically censoring pro-************ content. With the new content recommendation change, Meta’s response to that accusation today would likely be that it is applying its political content policies consistently.

How the change will play out in Australia

Notably, many Australians, especially in younger age groups,

This is the hidden content, please
and other social media platforms. Sometimes they are specifically seeking out news, but often not.

Not all news is political. But now, on

This is the hidden content, please
by default no news recommendations will be political. The serendipity of discovering political stories that motivate people to think or act will be lost.

Combined with Meta

This is the hidden content, please
they will no longer pay to support the *********** news and journalism shared on their platforms, it’s fair to say Meta is seeking to be as apolitical as possible.

The social media landscape is fracturing

With Elon Musk’s disastrous

This is the hidden content, please
rebranding to X, and TikTok facing the possibility of being banned altogether in the ******* States, Meta appears as the most stable of the big social media giants.

But with Meta positioning Threads as a potential new town square while

This is the hidden content, please
/X burns down, it’s hard to see what a town square looks like without politics.

The lack of political news, combined with a lack of any news on

This is the hidden content, please
, may well mean young people see even less news than before, and have less chance to engage politically.

In a Threads discussion,

This is the hidden content, please
Head Adam Mosseri made the
This is the hidden content, please
:

“Politics and hard news are important, I don’t want to imply otherwise. But my take is, from a platform’s perspective, any incremental engagement or revenue they might drive is not at all worth the scrutiny, negativity (let’s be honest), or integrity risks that come along with them.”

Like for

This is the hidden content, please
, for
This is the hidden content, please
and Threads politics is just too hard. The political process and democracy can be pretty hard, but it’s now clear that’s not Meta’s problem.

A chilling effect on creators

This is the hidden content, please
’s
This is the hidden content, please
also reminded content creators their accounts may no longer be recommended due to posting political content.

If political posts were preventing recommendation, creators could see the exact posts and choose to remove them. Content creators

This is the hidden content, please
, so the implication is clear: avoid politics.

Creators already spend considerable time trying to interpret what content platforms prefer, building

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
about which posts do best.

While that folklore is sometimes flawed, Meta couldn’t be clearer on this one: political posts will prevent audience growth, and thus make an already precarious living *******. That’s the definition of a political chilling effect.

For the audiences who turn to creators because they are

This is the hidden content, please
, the absence of political posts or positions will likely stifle political issues, discussion and thus ultimately democracy.

How do I opt back in?

For

This is the hidden content, please
and Threads users who want these platforms to still share political content recommendations, follow these steps:

  • go to your
    This is the hidden content, please
    profile and click the three lines to access your settings.
  • click on Suggested Content (or Content Preferences for some).
  • click on Political content, and then select “Don’t limit political content from people that you don’t follow.”

Provided by
The Conversation


This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please
under a Creative Commons license. Read the
This is the hidden content, please
.

Citation:

This is the hidden content, please
and Threads are limiting political content: Why this is terrible for democracy (2024, March 28)
retrieved 28 March 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.







This is the hidden content, please

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#terrible #democracy

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
https://hopzone.eu/forums/topic/8467-why-this-is-terrible-for-democracy/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.