One-third of Ukrainians would give up land for peace—but it’s not as simple as that

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

One-third of Ukrainians would give up land for peace—but it’s not as simple as that



Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

According to a recent

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

taken by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, almost one third of Ukrainians are now prepared to make territorial concessions to Russia if this brings the Russian war of aggression to a swift end and preserves their country’s independence. But more than half of the population rejects the idea of giving up territory for peace.

This may give an impression of a solid majority against concessions, but the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

among those willing to compromise is dramatic. It had remained at or below 10% until May, 2023. But with relentless bad news from the battlefront since the ******** of last year’s spring and summer offensive, it has risen steadily to the current 32%.

The growing war-weariness of increasing numbers of Ukrainians is unlikely to be reversed anytime soon given that Russia

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

along the almost 1,200km-long frontline, especially in the critical

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Although, it must be noted, there have been

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

—and the advances have come at

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in terms of lives on both sides.

Even if a majority of Ukrainians were eventually willing to trade some territory for peace, it’s not clear what a credible peace plan would look like.

Ukraine has not officially abandoned its idea of a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

pressuring Russia to end its aggression and withdraw from all the Ukrainian territory it has illegally occupied since 2014. But this looks like a vanishingly slim prospect.

So there needs to be a rethink of how Moscow and Kyiv can reach a mutually acceptable peace agreement that will stick. It’s inconceivable this could happen without the active engagement of Beijing and Washington, and possibly a larger

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of countries in a way that has been successfully used in the past.

Beijing shift towards Moscow

Recent efforts by Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, to involve China in peace-making efforts

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

for now. Following their

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on July 24, China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that the conditions for negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow were not ripe yet.

The ********

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is now that they “support all efforts that are conducive to peace and are willing to continue to play a constructive role in ending the ceasefire and the resumption of peace talks.” This is much more minimalist than

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of a “a lasting and just peace” that entails the full restoration of the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in its internationally recognized 1991 borders.

It’s also a striking contrast to China’s position paper on Ukraine from February 24, 2023. This

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

“the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries must be effectively upheld.” Now Beijing’s position is now much more closely aligned with Moscow’s, which

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on a ceasefire to freeze the current front lines.

Changing face of Washington

The other part of the equation is Washington. Donald Trump’s choice of a vice-presidential running-mate who said he couldn’t care less what happens to Ukraine seemed to bode ill for Kyiv. But Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the race and a strong initial campaign by his vice-president, Kamala Harris, makes a Trump-Vance White House far less of a foregone conclusion.

And, even if it were, the internal *********** debate on how to deal with the war in Ukraine is far from settled. Trump’s former secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, recently

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

a much more muscular approach to achieving peace in Ukraine. While it would also involve territorial concessions, it would include Ukrainian membership in a beefed-up Nato, as well as Kyiv’s swift accession to the EU.

But a Trump-Vance victory in November still looks more promising for ****** than the alternative. Harris has a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

as a staunch defender of Ukraine and critic of ******.

At present it’s far from clear whether Harris would take a tougher line than Biden or simply continue the path Biden has set—policies that, so far, have only prevented Ukraine from losing without providing it with a path to military victory.

Regardless of the outcome of November’s US election, ****** can take comfort from the fact that the current overall trajectory of the war is in his favor. Russia’s gradual gains on the battlefield have chipped away at the Ukrainian people’s willingness to endure whatever hardship is required to restore their country’s 1991 borders.

By the time there will be a new president in the White House in January 2025, this is unlikely to have changed for the better. China is politically clearly on Russia’s side, while Iran and North Korea offer important military supply lines.

The key question in the effort to end the war against Ukraine, therefore, is less about the need for a negotiated solution than it is about how to deal with each side’s red lines. And here, according to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, the issue of territorial concessions is less problematic than the question of Nato membership.

More than half of the Ukrainians polled ******* any deal that includes territorial compromises and simultaneously requires the country to forego Nato membership. But between 47% and 57% were willing to accept different degrees of territorial concessions to Russia if Ukraine can join the transatlantic alliance and receive security guarantees.

If such a compromise between Kyiv and Moscow were achieved, it would most likely come about as a result of pressure from Washington and Beijing. So the real question might be under what circumstances the US and China would see such a compromise, and therefore peace in Ukraine, in their own long-term strategic interests.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
One-third of Ukrainians would give up land for peace—but it’s not as simple as that (2024, July 31)
retrieved 31 July 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Onethird #Ukrainians #give #land #peacebut #simple

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/