Is there a ‘right way’ to teach? Recent debates suggest yes, but students and schools are much more complex

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Is there a ‘right way’ to teach? Recent debates suggest yes, but students and schools are much more complex



Credit: Max Fischer from Pexels

New South Wales has just announced a curriculum “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” for

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to start in 2027.

As well as new content about the human body, consent and screen time, there will be a change in the way students will be taught. This involves an emphasis on “explicit instruction” and a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

from student-led or “inquiry-based learning.”

This follows recent moves in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, to implement “explicit instruction” around reading.

What does this mean?

Explicit instruction

According to the NSW Education Department,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

involves teachers “clearly explaining, demonstrating and modeling to students” why they are learning something, what they need to learn and how it connects to what they already know.

It does not involve “students engaging in independent learning activities and problem solving before teachers provide the necessary explanations, demonstration or modeling.” This latter approach describes “inquiry-based learning.”

This approach

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

critical and creative thinking so students can develop their abilities to ask questions, interpret evidence, form explanations and arguments, and communicate findings.

Announcing the changes this week, NSW Education Minister Prue Car

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

:

“For the first time, primary school teachers have a set of syllabuses that make sense together […] Teachers will have clarity on exactly what they need to teach, based on evidence.”

But the way this evidence is presented is

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Is it really one or the other?

These changes and the media coverage around them suggest there are binaries or “either/or” options when it comes to teaching methods.

For example, those in favor of explicit teaching claim they have found “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” in the classroom. As the *********** Education Research Organization

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, it “allows students to process new information more effectively.”

Yet my

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on successful approaches in *********** classrooms reveals teachers use a range of strategies to teach and engage students.

This is important because

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

exposing students to different kinds of learning experiences is important for their development. One teaching approach in one school for one student in one subject will differ for another in another content area. Context matters.

So teachers need to be able to use their

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the classroom. This is why some scholars argue we should see

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and not a precise science.

Why are we having this debate?

We see regular headlines that students are “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

(even though this is not

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

). This is combined with ongoing criticism that our teachers are

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

for the classroom.

But politicians have a vested interest in the school system being (or appearing to be) “successful” for parents and voters. As my co-author Don Carter’s

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

shows, the education minister’s offices often seek rapid answers to wickedly complex challenges in schools.

*********** schools are facing acute teacher shortages,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and big gaps in outcomes for advantaged and disadvantaged students. These are not simple issues.

It is also important to note you can use “evidence” to justify multiple stances. For example, when it comes to the ***** and ***** of single-**** versus co-ed schools, there is research to support both sides.

The same is true when it comes to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Meanwhile, some of the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

used in these debates is from think tanks whose research is not awarded

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

or peer-review by other academics.

What does this mean for schools and families?

Some of these policy changes will mean teachers are changing how they teach, but often will simply continue to do what they have always done.

But these debates can have a cost as they once more suggest teachers don’t know how to teach effectively or need more help to do so.

Current debates about teaching can also be confusing for parents who hear about falling standards and the need for new methods. It also presents schooling as a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

where a child is sent to learn and behave in certain ways.

For parents, it may help to remember the most important things have not changed: your child is progressing at school, they are engaged in what they are learning and they are happy to go.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
Is there a ‘right way’ to teach? Recent debates suggest yes, but students and schools are much more complex (2024, July 25)
retrieved 25 July 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#teach #debates #suggest #students #schools #complex

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/