U.S. planning ‘draconian’ sanctions against China’s semiconductor industry: Report

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

U.S. planning ‘draconian’ sanctions against China’s semiconductor industry: Report



The U.S. government is considering implementing more severe restrictions on China’s access to advanced chip making tools, which some of the country’s allies reportedly call ‘draconian,’ reports 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Key proposals include applying the Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR), pressuring allies to limit service and repair of equipment in China, and broadening the unverified list requiring licenses for certain technologies. These measures aim to hinder advancements of China’s semiconductor industry. 

One key proposal is the application of the Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR), which would allow the U.S. to exert control over foreign-produced items that contain any ********* technology. This would particularly impact companies like Tokyo Electron and ASML, restricting their ability to provide China with advanced wafer fab equipment (WFE). This measure is seen as ‘draconian’ by U.S. allies, but it reflects the administration’s determination to restrict China’s chipmaking progress. 

Additionally, the U.S. is urging its allies, including Japan and the Netherlands, to impose stricter limits on their companies capabilities to service and repair semiconductor equipment already delivered to China. Again, if enacted, this will primarily impact ASML and Tokyo Electron. This measure aims to prevent ******** chipmakers, such as SMIC, from maintaining or upgrading their equipment using foreign assistance, thereby stalling their progress in developing more advanced nodes and producing chips on sophisticated process technologies. 

Further sanctions on specific ******** semiconductor companies are also under consideration. These additional measures would tighten existing controls and increase the pressure on China’s chipmakers. The U.S. government wants to ensure that ******** firms have limited access to critical technology, thereby hindering their ability to advance in the semiconductor industry. 

Another strategy involves expanding the criteria for the unverified list. This list requires companies to obtain licenses for shipping certain restricted technologies. By broadening this list, the U.S. aims to signal that firms continuing to serve ******** customers deemed security risks might face additional controls, which could prevent ******** companies from circumventing current restrictions by relying on foreign equipment and expertise. 

The U.S. WFE industry has voiced concerns that current export restrictions unfairly harm ********* companies while not irrecoverably hindering ******** progress. Yet, companies like Applied Materials, KLA, and LAM Research argue that the proposed FDPR and other measures could lead to non-cooperation from allies and incentivize global firms to exclude U.S. technology from their supply chains. The ********* makers of fab equipment are reportedly advocating for expanding the criteria for the so-called unverified list to prevent ******** firms from bypassing existing controls.

But while these measures aim to hinder China’s technological advancements and to some degree protect ********* technologies from being copied by ******** companies, they also pose significant economic challenges and risks for U.S. and allied companies as they too can lose sales due to U.S. curbs against China.

Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#U.S #planning #draconian #sanctions #Chinas #semiconductor #industry #Report

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/