Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

England’s rural housing crisis could be solved by fixing land prices and bringing land into public ownership


Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member

England’s rural housing crisis could be solved by fixing land prices and bringing land into public ownership

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Young people are

This is the hidden content, please
being priced out of rural communities by soaring housing costs. Official statistics for England show that affordability in rural parts of the country is worse than in towns and cities, excluding London. In 2021, even the
This is the hidden content, please
in rural areas cost around 9.2 times more than the earnings of the lowest paid workers. In urban areas, it was eight times more.

Since Brexit, there has been a rise in the number of landlords transferring long-term rental housing into short-term lettings on platforms like Airbnb, in a bid to cash in on the growing staycation market. COVID has increased the appeal of rural living, with more people buying second homes. Affordability has worsened since 2020.

These recent pressures have accentuated the decades-old trends of general counter-urbanization and demand for rural homes that my colleagues and I discuss in our 2022 book,

This is the hidden content, please
.

A combination of planning constraint and external demand pressures, focused on the smallest villages and hamlets, is driving land price expectation and making it

This is the hidden content, please
. Land values
This is the hidden content, please
to the communities that create them. A way needs to be found of fixing the cost of land at a price that supports the delivery of affordable homes in rural locations.

Upward pressure on land price

Rural planning authorities largely operate according to the rationale that housing and service needs can more effectively be met in towns than in the countryside. They generally respond to increased housing demand in rural areas by allocating sites in service centers and larger towns for new development. They also fix policies in local plans that require the inclusion of affordable homes in market-led schemes.

Far less gets built in villages. There, the existing stock is gradually sold as investment opportunities to wealthier incomers or to seasonal and weekend residents. This dynamic places upward pressure on land prices.

In those few instances where sites for market development are allocated in smaller villages, land price soars. The resulting housing is high end and unaffordable to local people.

It is within this challenging market that

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
, formed by groups of concerned residents, try to secure affordable land for affordable housing through the so-called
This is the hidden content, please
approach.

Since 1991, communities have been able to work with partners on securing exceptional planning permission for affordable homes on small parcels of unallocated land (sufficient for up to a dozen homes, depending on the scale of proven local need) on which permission for housing would not normally be granted.

Getting a landowner to accept that this is an “exception” to normal planning—and not a regular allocation—is a key hurdle. The landowner needs to agree to sell plots at a price that supports affordability.

Affordable land supports affordable housing

Since 2012, exception sites have been able to include market housing, whose role is to support project viability in a context of falling grant rates. Those grants are channeled to registered providers by

This is the hidden content, please
, a government agency sponsored by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Government has been targeting grant-free development, with the help of the market, although exception sites usually need some grants to achieve viability.

But the inclusion of market homes on rural exception sites comes at a cost. Landowners’ price expectations are raised, driving up the price paid for land, and meaning that an ever larger component of market housing is needed to cross-subsidize the affordable element. ******* developments comprising more homes for *****, and relatively fewer affordable homes for local need, will not gain the same level of community support.

Threats to the viability of rural exception sites, largely because of rising land costs, means that communities stand to lose a critical source of affordable homes in otherwise unaffordable villages. The question is what can be done about this.

Raising grant rates would allow social housing providers (or taxpayers) to bear higher land costs. But our

This is the hidden content, please
notes that this is unlikely to happen given public funding constraints and governments’ preference for market support. And in any case, the justice of such an approach (taxpayers effectively subsidizing landowners’ rent extractions) is questionable.

A fairer approach would be to fix the cost of land at a price that supports a range of affordable housing types. That fix can be achieved by setting an advisory price for rural exception sites in

This is the hidden content, please
or, where an advisory price does not encourage *****, by using simplified and remodeled compulsory purchase powers to bring land into public ownership. Experience elsewhere in the *** shows that the prospect of compulsory purchase is often enough to encourage landowners to
This is the hidden content, please
.

Our research has shown that the land price that typically supports affordability on rural exception sites is

This is the hidden content, please
. Assuming a valuation density of 35 dwellings per hectare, this figure is far higher than agricultural value (£600 for a similarly-sized plot), but far lower than full residential value (£150,000, say,
This is the hidden content, please
).

Some landowners will accept a price that supports affordability, motivated by a ******* to help their communities. Others will resist ***** at any price short of full residential value. Right now, however, too much is being left to the market.

Local authorities need the power to bring small plots of land into public ownership, quickly and at an affordable price. This would enable registered providers and community land trusts, and also local councils, to match their building programs to the scale of need for rural housing.

Provided by
The Conversation


This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please
under a Creative Commons license. Read the
This is the hidden content, please
.

Citation:
England’s rural housing crisis could be solved by fixing land prices and bringing land into public ownership (2024, March 21)
retrieved 21 March 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





This is the hidden content, please

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Englands #rural #housing #crisis #solved #fixing #land #prices #bringing #land #public #ownership

This is the hidden content, please

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.