Diamond Member Pelican Press 0 Posted March 21 Diamond Member Share Posted March 21 How ‘himpathy’ helps shield perpetrators of ******* misconduct from repercussions Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain Former U.S. President Donald Trump has faced This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up over the decades. He’s the first president to This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , and in January, he was ordered to pay over This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to E. Jean Carroll for defamatory statements related to her ******* ******** claims. Despite all this, many of Trump’s supporters anticipate his history of ******* misconduct will This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Some even believe he is a This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville went so far as to say the ******* ******** verdict made him This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up In contrast, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up that she has experienced “almost an endless stream of people repeating what Donald Trump said—that I was a liar, I was in it for the money, I can’t wait for the payout…that I was too ugly to go on living.” In addition to the barrage of online trolling, she also received This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . These outcomes are consistent with prior research that has found most men accused of ******* misconduct This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up such as This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . In contrast, women who report such incidents often face significant consequences, including This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up or This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , we sought to understand why alleged perpetrators of ******* ******** often escape repercussions while their accusers incur intense backlash in organizations. Responses to ******* misconduct Across five studies using real-world stories from organizations, social media responses to #MeToo claims, and experiments, we examined how third parties—people who learn of ******* misconduct claims but are not directly involved—respond to ******* misconduct accusations across several industries. Our research found third parties tend to evaluate individuals involved in ******* misconduct claims based on their moral values as outlined by This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . This theory argues there are five global moral values: alleviating suffering (care), promoting equity and equality (fairness), being loyal and devoted to your groups (loyalty), showing deference to those in power (authority), and practicing physical and spiritual cleanliness (purity). Research has found that people value the five moral foundations This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Some people tend to care more about the foundations of respect for authority, loyalty and purity, while others tend to emphasize care and fairness. People who highly value respect for authority, loyalty and purity tend to view behavior that threatens the stability of groups and institutions as immoral. We build on this to suggest that ******* misconduct allegations against men in positions of authority could be offensive to those who endorse these values. Our research indicates that moral concerns about loyalty, authority and purity can give rise to This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up —a term coined by philosopher Kate Manne that describes the excessive sympathy directed toward alleged male perpetrators and the anger directed toward accusing female victims. Moral drivers of ‘himpathy’ In a study of 4,000 tweets from the #MeToo movement, we found tweets containing words related to authority, loyalty and purity were more likely to express sympathy toward alleged perpetrators and anger toward accusing victims. We also found a similar pattern in stories people shared about witnessing or hearing about workplace ******* harassment. People who valued loyalty, authority and purity were more likely to feel sympathetic toward the person accused and ****** toward the accuser. Our studies showed that himpathy negatively impacts judgements about credibility and results in motivations to resolve injustice in favour of the perpetrator rather than the victim. This ultimately leads to a reduced inclination to punish the alleged perpetrator and a greater willingness to penalize the accusing victim. These moral concerns seem to flip the expected narrative on its head: when people care a lot about authority, loyalty and purity, they are more likely to construe the accused as the victim and his accuser as the villain. Our findings suggest that a small yet influential subset of employees is prone to hostile moral reactions toward victims, which might motivate them to protect perpetrators and potentially allow for misconduct to continue. What leaders can do Although himpathy will likely continue to occur in political arenas and organizations, there are steps managers and leaders can take to prevent himpathy from protecting perpetrators and causing additional harm to victims. In one of the experiments in our study, we found that leaders can contribute to increased backlash against victims when they question the victim’s morality in front of their co-workers who strongly value loyalty, authority, and purity. Thus, we recommend managers remain as neutral as possible to avoid facilitating **********, inequitable social consequences for either party involved in a ******* ******** claim. We further encourage organizations to hire third-party investigators not emotionally connected to the case. If this isn’t possible, leaders can build impartial investigative committees with employees holding diverse perspectives and values, which would help prevent anyone who may feel sympathetic to the accused from overly influencing disciplinary decisions. Once an investigation has taken place, the appropriate actions can and should be taken. In doing so, organizations can reduce backlash toward victims who come forward, like Carroll, and ensure appropriate actions are taken when misconduct occurs. Provided by The Conversation This article is republished from This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up under a Creative Commons license. Read the This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Citation: How ‘himpathy’ helps shield perpetrators of ******* misconduct from repercussions (2024, March 21) retrieved 21 March 2024 from This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science #himpathy #helps #shield #perpetrators #******* #misconduct #repercussions This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Link to comment https://hopzone.eu/forums/topic/5769-how-%E2%80%98himpathy%E2%80%99-helps-shield-perpetrators-of-sexual-misconduct-from-repercussions/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now