The Founders Meant to Keep Government Out of the Church, Not God Out of the Government

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

The Founders Meant to Keep Government Out of the *******, Not **** Out of the Government

The 4th of July makes us think of our independence and freedoms. And recent legal battles over religious liberty in the U.S.A. raise serious questions about the freedom to worship in America. So when our Founders came up with the First Amendment, were they trying to keep the government free from religion, or religion free from government?  

These days, the phrase “wall of separation between ******* and state” has come to mean keeping **** or His believers from having a big effect on government and public life. But that’s far, far from what the Founding Fathers were thinking of when they were separating ******* and state.

***** of an All-Powerful State ******* Wed to the Power of the Government

They were afraid of what so many of the Old World countries had: a religion established by the state as its one true religion, that would tyrannically rule over the ****** and conscience of every citizen.

As the Providence Forum’s Peter Lillback put it, “They recognized having a monolithic ******* was a dangerous thing.”  That’s because it made the king not only their physical sovereign but also their all-powerful spiritual ruler.

Before the Pilgrims fled England, Wallbuilders’ David Barton recalled, “The Pilgrims’ pastor was ********* because he made the statement that ****** ******* is head of the *******. And the monarch said, ‘oh no, I’m the head of the *******. You’re *****.’”

Wouldn’t Allow a ******* of America Like the Brits Had the ******* of England

Knowing of such ******* and tyranny, AmericanMinute.com historian William Federer explained how the Founders felt: “Their big ***** was the federal government was going to follow the blueprint of every country in Europe and pick one national denomination.”

So what they meant by saying in the First Amendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” was that the federal government was banned from creating – or “establishing” – a national religion with the national government wedded to it.

“They didn’t want to have a national, established ******* of America like you have the ******* of England, forcing people to believe something that they didn’t believe in,” said Jerry Newcombe, host of the radio program “Vocal Point”.

“What they said was, ‘We don’t want a state ******* here. Consciously, therefore, they were separating the ******* from government,” Lillback said.

But that was strictly to protect the churches and each believer’s ****** and conscience from the government.

All About Protecting Each *********’s Conscience and Freedom to Believe

Not only did the First Amendment say, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” but it also said, “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

“What they wanted was the freedom that we have in the ******: the rights of conscience,” Barton said. “And they didn’t want the state telling us how we could or couldn’t practice our ******.”

Lillback said the Founders keeping government control away from ****** meant, “Each of us has a right to be who we are before ****. It has been well said and it’s a classic statement of religious liberty that man is not free unless he is free on the inside.  We have to have the freedom to believe what we believe. That’s what the First Amendment protects.”

***Please sign up for 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 and download the 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 to ensure you keep receiving the latest news from a distinctly ********** perspective.*** 

‘****: He’s on Both Sides of the Wall’

And that’s what ********** historian Eddie Hyatt explained Thomas Jefferson was talking about when he wrote the letter that first used the famous “wall of separation” phrase to a group of worried Baptists.

“He said that the First Amendment had erected a wall of separation that would protect them from any intrusion of the government,” Hyatt stated. “In Jefferson’s mind, the wall of separation was a uni-directional wall, put there to keep the government out of the *******; not to keep the influence of the ******* out of the government.”

There was no antipathy towards the Lord in all of this, Lillback insisted, saying, “But the idea of ****: He’s on both sides of the wall. And He’s welcome there. And He should be.”

The Government Is Reaching Over that Wall, Bossing Around People of ******

But today, there’s been a complete flip.

Lillback said, “Those who once believed in this really high and impregnable wall of ******* and state, we now see the government reaching over that wall and saying, ‘but don’t preach that text of scripture.’”  

STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FREE CBN NEWS APPClick Here Get the App with Special Alerts on Breaking News and Top Stories

Barton added, “All of a sudden the government’s regulating religious activities, which is what Jefferson said they would not do because of separation of ******* and state.”

Hyatt lamented, “The Founders would be so distressed to see how that statement has been turned on its head.”

As Newcombe explained, “They absolutely did not mean the separation of **** and government, which is what’s often being practiced today.”

No One ‘Under Government,’ but Each One ‘Under ****’

Lillback encourages Americans to remember what the nation’s Founders intended.

“This is a theistic government. So **** was not separated from government,” he insisted. “So any interpretation of the First Amendment that takes **** out of government is turning the whole story on its head. Rather it was taking a formal state ******* out of the equation, leaving it up to each individual. But all, as we still say, ‘under ****.’ That was the view of our Founders.”

They believed a nation based on liberty could only stay free if its citizens were godly people. As Barton pointed out, believers in **** have their eyes on eternity, and it makes them practice self-control.  

Knowing You’ll Answer to **** Makes You Govern Yourself

“When you’re ****-conscious, you realize, ‘ya know, I’m going to have to answer to Him for what I do,’ and it limits my bad behavior,” Barton stated.

Newcombe added, “That’s something the Founders believed very strongly: that we’re going to be accountable before ****.”

Hyatt said of those Founders, “They knew that they were creating a nation for a free people, but also for a virtuous people who would govern themselves from within.”

You need very little police power if people, because of conscience, will police themselves.

Green Bean Control Laws?

“Self-control is what you need,” Barton explained. “We can pass all the control laws we want. But unless you control the heart, you’ll never control behavior. I mean, I can ***** somebody with a can of green beans. What are we going to do?  Pass green bean control laws if somebody does that? No. It’s on the inside.”

And the Founders knew to keep America true and free, they also needed the perfect law of a loving, all-wise ****.

As Lillback put it, “There was a clear understanding that the government needed to have an ultimate check and balance, even beyond the people that ran it and their elections. And that is the transcendent law of ****.  And so that is why when we look at our Declaration of Independence, there are four references to Deity.”

Going through the Declaration, Lillback ***** them out: “‘We’re endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights.’ The laws of **** and nature. And it tells us there’s an appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world. And, finally, a dependence on the Providence of ****. Four references to Deity.”

Not Godless at All

But then came the US Constitution, which some say is a godless document because **** isn’t mentioned in it. As soon as they were done with it, though, the Founders called for a day of Thanksgiving to ****.

“They were not thinking ‘let’s get rid of ****’,” Lillback stated. “They said ‘We have been given now a new Constitution, and now amendments that give us our freedoms. And where do we turn? We turn to heaven and thank **** for this’.”

“Now, if their intent was to get rid of **** from government, boy did they miss their point,” Lillback said.  “Because they turned around and thanked Him for everything that they had. It shows the utter historical absurdity of ‘the godless Constitution’.”

Constitution’s Last Words Reference *******

And **** isn’t really absent from the Constitution or its authors’ lives.

“They are not godless,” Lillback insisted. “They are people who at the very end of their work said ‘In the year of our Lord, 1787.’  The very last words in the Constitution are a reference to ****** *******.”

He concluded, “It’s no surprise then that the ultimate motto is We are One Nation Under ****.”

*This story was originally published in July 2020. 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Establishment of religion, state *******, national *******, wall of separation between ******* and state, wall of separation, Thomas Jefferson, First Amendment, free exercise, Founding Fathers, Founders, Pilgrims, ******, conscience, under ****, One Nation Under ****, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, Constitution, Paul Strand, CBN News, cbnnewsyoutube
#Founders #Meant #Government #******* #**** #Government

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up