Liberal justices warn of ‘nightmare scenarios’

[Pelican Press 0]

******** justices warn of ‘nightmare scenarios’

Three justices have issued a blistering dissent to the landmark US Supreme Court opinion granting Donald Trump partial immunity from prosecution, warning that it will allow presidential power to be used “for evil ends”.

The 6-3 historic decision effectively strips out key parts of an indictment against the former president for allegedly conspiring to overturn his 2020 election defeat.

Six *************-leaning justices signed the majority opinion, but the three liberals dissented.

Led by Sonia Sotomayor, they expressed “***** for our democracy”.

“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to ************ a political rival?” Justice Sotomayor wrote. “Immune.”

“Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”

“Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done,” Justice Sotomayor wrote. “In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”

She was joined in her dissent by the court’s two other ******** justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan.

Justice Jackson wrote in a separate dissent that the majority’s ruling “breaks new and dangerous ground” by “discarding” the nation’s long-held principle that no-one is above the law.

“That core principle has long prevented our Nation from devolving into despotism,” she said.

Justice Sotomayor argued that the majority had invented a notion of absolute immunity for a president performing “official acts”, even though it has at times been assumed that presidents could be prosecuted for things they did while in office.

She cited Richard Nixon getting pardoned by the president who succeeded him, Gerald Ford, for using his official powers to obstruct an investigation into the Watergate burglary – the scandal that eventually led to Mr Nixon’s resignation.

Those involved in the case were under the presumption that Mr Nixon did not have immunity and could be prosecuted after leaving office, Justice Sotomayor wrote.

Her opinion went much further back in history as well. She quoted US Founding Father Alexander Hamilton, who wrote that former presidents would be “liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law”.

But the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, argued that the dissenters “strike a tone of chilling ***** that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today”.

He wrote that the ******** justices were “***** mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals” and dismissed their legal reasoning as weak.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#******** #justices #warn #nightmare #scenarios

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up