Why we might be measuring happiness wrong

[Pelican Press 0]

Why we might be measuring happiness wrong

Distribution of preferred levels. The figure shows the distribution of preferred level: all scores below 7 were grouped into one ******. The differences between the Cantril Ladder to all the other conditions were statistically significant both by using pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum tests (all p < 0.001 adjusted for multiple comparisons, r = 0.16–19) and pairwise t-tests of the estimated marginal means that were adjusted for age, gender, and subjective social status (all p < 0.001 adjusted for multiple comparisons, d = 0.27–0.39, for more details, see the “Statistical analysis” section). Credit: Scientific Reports (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52939-y

Many of us know that Finland is steadily ranked as the happiest country in the world. The basis for this is the annual World Happiness Report, which is based on a simple question about happiness asked to people around the world. However, a new study led by Lund University in Sweden suggests that it makes people think more about power and wealth.

Using the same question to measure happiness over time and cultures is arguably a simple and fair way to compare results on a global scale—no easy task, after all. How happy are countries around the world really?

The question at the center of the World Happiness Report is known as The Cantril Ladder:

“Please imagine a ladder with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. The top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you, and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?”

A new experimental study involving 1,500 adults in the *** has examined how people actually interpret that question. The results show that it often brings to mind concepts of wealth and power. This might not be how most of us would define happiness and well-being.

“The risk is that we are measuring a narrow, wealth and power-oriented form of well-being, rather than broader definitions of happiness,” says August Nilsson, Ph.D. student, and first author.

When the researchers tweaked the Cantril question, for example, by replacing “best possible life” with “most harmonious life,” this changed the results, making the respondents think less of power and wealth.

Previous research has shown that The Cantril Ladder reflects people’s income levels and social status to a larger degree than other well-being metrics. The current study adds more evidence that perhaps the simple but powerful question could be complemented in the future.

“Our study was conducted solely in the ***, so of course, this research should be performed in other countries too, given the global nature of this topic. However, our results indicate that we aren’t necessarily measuring happiness and well-being in a way that is in line with how we actually define those concepts in our lives.”

“This deserves further exploration. It is particularly relevant to understand how people interpret happiness questions since how happy someone is and how they define happiness can’t be determined by a researcher but by people themselves,” concludes Nilsson.

About the study

In an experiment involving 1,500 individuals in the ***, the researchers examined how individuals think about The Cantril Ladder compared to differently phrased questions.

The researchers found that people associate the Cantril Ladder question with power and wealth much more than with the other questions. For example, of all the words people used to interpret the Cantril Ladder (including ‘stop’ words with little meaning), 17% were power and money words.

When the researchers removed the ladder analogy from the question, they found that the power and money language was reduced to 11%, and when removing the bottom vs. top description of the scale, it was further reduced to 7%. For these questions, people still described money, but in the form of “financial security” and “enough money” rather than in terms of “wealth, rich, upper class,” as was the case for the Cantril Ladder.

Also, when the question was re-phrased by replacing “number 10 represents the best life for you” with “number 10 represents the most harmonious life for you,” this resulted in fewer thoughts of power and wealth (5%), and more thoughts of broader well-being—including relationships, work-life balance, and health.

The paper is

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the journal Scientific Reports.

More information:
August Håkan Nilsson et al, The Cantril Ladder elicits thoughts about power and wealth, Scientific Reports (2024).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Provided by
Lund University

Citation:
World Happiness Report: Why we might be measuring happiness wrong (2024, March 20)
retrieved 20 March 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#measuring #happiness #wrong

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up