Why did more female infants than male infants die in Europe from 1700 to 1950?

[Pelican Press 0]

Why did more female infants than male infants **** in Europe from 1700 to 1950?

**** ratio at birth, Spain, 1900–1930. Credit: Cliometrica (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11698-023-00267-y

“Missing ****** in Historical Europe” is a major

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

at NTNU in which researchers have looked into numbers of ****** and boys in ********* countries over a 250-year *******. They found that the number of male children was higher in several countries during periods of ******** and poor living conditions.

The researchers noticed this trend in Southern and Eastern ********* countries. It was most obvious in Greece, but can also be seen in Norway.

“We found similar patterns in all of these countries, albeit to varying degrees. In the other ********* countries, the problem was minimal,” says Francisco Beltrán Tapia. Tapia is a professor of history at NTNU and is leading the research project.

Findings from the project have been published in articles in a number of journals, including

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Spanish school statistics

Francisco Beltrán Tapia first noticed the phenomenon while researching gender distribution among school-age children in Spain throughout history. He discovered that in some regions and in some periods, there were more significantly boys than ******.

This piqued his interest, so the researchers included the whole of Europe in the “Missing ******” project.

The research project is examining whether discriminatory practices increased female mortality rates during infancy and childhood in Europe from 1700 to 1950.

****** have a biological advantage

****** have a natural biological advantage when it comes to survival from the fetal stage onwards. The majority of stillbirths and miscarriages are boys. Baby boys are also more vulnerable to stress than baby ******, and more prone to *********.

Females are also better equipped to survive famine and epidemics. An international research team established this by studying historical

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

from seven different crises that have occurred over the past 250 years.

Despite this, the source material collected during “Missing ******” shows that more ****** than boys ***** during certain periods in some ********* countries and regions.

But why?

Boys were prioritized and given more food

The reason is that boys experienced better living conditions and were prioritized by their parents during difficult periods of ******** and famine. Boys were given more food than ******, mothers tended to breastfeed boys longer, and boys received better care and living conditions.

In environments with high mortality rates, the way ****** were treated when they got *****, as well as the amount of work they were required to do, could have led to more of them dying from the combined effects of malnutrition and ********.

Of course, this was not true for all families, but the numbers speak for themselves. The researchers collected their data by examining censuses, population statistics, birth records and ****** records.

They have also looked at the number of abandoned infants who ended up at orphanages. It turns out that the majority were ****** during difficult periods, especially in certain parts of Europe.

Widespread phenomenon in Asia

This is a known phenomenon in some ****** countries.

“Gender discrimination in the form of ****-selective *********, the ******** of female infants and fatal neglect of young ****** is found in developing countries, especially in South and East Asia,” Beltrán Tapia said.

The Indian economist, philosopher and Nobel laureate Amartya Sen, helped highlight this problem 30 years ago.

“Economic and cultural factors have influenced the perception of women’s value in these regions for a long time, resulting in millions of ‘missing ******.’ We have now found that the same phenomenon has also been far more prevalent than previously thought in Europe, especially in Southern and Eastern Europe,” Beltrán Tapia said.

****** were an economic burden

Boys were considered more valuable than ******. In recent ********* history, this is most clearly expressed in Greece.

Boys were able to get work and contribute to the family economy. ******’ and women’s work in the home was not valued or considered financially profitable.

“We find descriptions of ****** being of less value in stories and songs from Greek folklore. ****** were often considered a burden,” says Beltrán Tapia.

One important aspect was the traditional practice of marrying ****** off, which meant that the girl’s family had to pay a dowry. In other words, ****** were expensive.

“A strong preference for sons clearly increased female mortality around childbirth and throughout infancy and childhood in Greece, at least until the 1920s. Our estimates indicate that more than 5% of ****** ‘disappeared’ between 1861 and 1920,” says Beltrán Tapia.

A strict patriarchal system

Ph.D. candidate and researcher Eftychia Kalaitzidou has focused on Greece and reviewed interviews of elderly people from the 1970s and 1980s. They said that the birth of a baby girl was not met with much enthusiasm, and usually quite the opposite.

“In Greece, we found that the family system was a clear cause of sexist practices,” says Beltrán Tapia.

This was evident in various case studies.

“This view is supported by a large body of qualitative evidence such as contemporary accounts, folklore traditions and anthropological studies. These all highlight the fact that ****** were neglected because of their lower status in society,” says Beltrán Tapia.

“The Greek findings reflect some of the conditions that have been associated with female neglect in South and East Asia, namely a strong patriarchal system based on strict kinship and dowry systems,” he says.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, many Greek men emigrated from Greece. This further weakened women’s position in the marriage market due to a shortage of potential husbands.

“It is likely that female status was also weakened by a ***** of conflicts and blood feuds, a trait that was reinforced by the concept of honor that was characteristic of Greek culture and other Mediterranean cultures,” says Beltrán Tapia.

Also evident in Spain

These practices are also evident in Spain in the 19th century, although they are less extreme.

“Extensive ******* records actually give a more detailed picture. They confirm not only that some families neglected their female *******, but also that sexist practices continued throughout childhood,” says Beltrán Tapia.

However, this behavior was less prominent during the first year of life. This is related to the fact that once ******* were accepted into the family, they were protected by breastfeeding. Gender differences in mortality rates clearly re-emerged when the children were weaned.

“Discriminatory practices seem to have been part of a generalized cultural system that favored boys in terms of access to food and care. However, the findings appear to be most prevalent among poor, landless families who were exposed to harsh economic conditions,” says Beltrán Tapia.

The Spanish Civil War

The phenomenon is evident in Spain until the 1940s, due to the Spanish Civil War (1936 to 1939), which led to widespread ******** in the country.

There was extensive rationing in Spain in the first decade after the civil war, agriculture was decimated, and there was a severe shortage of food. Lack of fuel made the distribution of basic products difficult.

Infanticide and child marriage

Information on more than 300 populations in historical Europe taken from the Mosaic project shows that gender differences among children tended to be greater in places with patrilocal norms. This is where women were married at a young age and couples lived near or in the same house as the husband’s parents.

“The intensity of patriarchal values explains much of the regional differences,” Beltrán Tapia said.

It was also not unheard of for female ******* to be ******* by their parents.

“This aspect probably gets the most attention, but it is just a small part of the whole picture. It is the other mechanisms that had the greatest impact: that ****** got less food, often shorter breastfeeding periods, poorer care and generally worse living conditions than boys,” says Beltrán Tapia.

What happened in Norway?

Ph.D. candidate and researcher Marko Kovacevic has investigated Norwegian population statistics. The phenomenon has not been so widespread in Norway, but during periods of severe food shortages in the 18th century, researchers see the same tendency where boys were prioritized and likely to be given more food than ******.

1741 was a terrible year in Norway; grain crops and other harvests *******. It was the start of a famine that led to many people dying of starvation. Those who survived were severely malnourished, and many ***** from dysentery.

From 1741 to 1743, there were 50% more deaths than births, and the population decreased by 3.5%. More ****** than boys ***** during this *******—despite the fact that ****** have a biological advantage in terms of survival.

Marko Kovacevic’s study of the situation in Norway will eventually be published in book form.

****** and education

Discriminatory patterns affecting women’s mortality early in life disappeared during the first decades of the 20th century in Europe. As economic, social and cultural changes improved the standard of living, overall mortality rates declined and undermined the son preference.

An improved standard of living and long-term efforts to improve gender equality also gave ****** and women better access to education. This led to financial independence, knowledge, increased status and better health. Nowadays, in many countries women make up the majority of people taking higher education.

More information:
Rebeca Echavarri et al, Economic development, female wages and missing female births in Spain, 1900–1930, Cliometrica (2023).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Francisco J. Beltrán Tapia et al, Missing ****** in ******** Italy, 1861–1921, The Economic History Review (2023).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Provided by
Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Citation:
Why did more female infants than male infants **** in Europe from 1700 to 1950? (2024, March 8)
retrieved 8 March 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#female #infants #male #infants #**** #Europe

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up