Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member



No, an old iPhone won’t beat the Snapdragon X Elite

Arif Bacchus / Digital Trends

Update 6/14/24: A slate of new Geekbench 6 results show that the Snapdragon X Elite performs about as well as Qualcomm claimed, at least in the Galaxy Book4 Edge.

This is the hidden content, please
, which were uploaded last night and this morning, show the processor reaching the advertised 4GHz and hitting single-core speeds that aligned with Qualcomm’s claims. Multi-core speeds are still a bit below where expected, but not by much.

Although these new results show that there’s a little more to the story than the peak performance of Qualcomm’s new chips, it’s important to wait for proper reviews to vet the performance of these processors. At the moment, it appears the software isn’t final, so it’s hard to draw any firm conclusions about performance before the processors release on June 18.

Original story below:

Benchmarks for the upcoming Snapdragon X Elite chip are already making the rounds, and they’re disappointing. One user on

This is the hidden content, please
, u/caponica23, received the Samsung Galaxy Book Edge 14 early and
This is the hidden content, please
with some initial findings. And the performance of the Snapdragon X Elite chip inside the PC is much lower than expected.

In Geekbench, the user showed single-core results of 1,841 and multi-core results of 11,537. That’s bad. For reference, Qualcomm said in early demos that the Snapdragon X Elite could reach a score of 2,977 in single-core and 15,086 in multi-core performance. The user also took the laptop out for a spin in Resident Evil Village at 1080p, and said there were “severe frame drops” even with AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) set to Performance mode.


Arif Bacchus / Digital Trends

These results run counter to the handful of times we’ve seen the Snapdragon X Elite in action. It provided a solid gaming experience for us in Control, and we heard from Qualcomm that it would be able to beat Apple’s M3 inside the MacBook Air. These benchmark results tell a different story.

Perhaps the most damning comparison comes on X (formerly

This is the hidden content, please
), where one user says that the Snapdragon X Elite’s single-core performance is slower than an iPhone 12 Mini. Yikes.

For those who can’t comprehend how f*cking ********** this is, X Elite’s actual big core performance is slower than the 4-year-old A14 chip in the iPhone 12 mini.

Qualcomm initially inflated the single-core score to 3200, which dropped to 2900 in an actual Windows environment,…

This is the hidden content, please

— INIYSA (@lafaiel)

This is the hidden content, please

There is an explanation here. The unit that was tested was limited to a clock speed of 2.52GHz, while the Snapdragon X Elite should be able to reach 4GHz. It’s just tough to say if the chip is intentionally limited or if there will be some sort of update that will improve performance before the first Snapdragon X Elite laptops launch next week.

One reason the chip could be limited is battery life. In their testing, the user found that the Samsung Galaxy Book Edge 14 lasted about 14 hours on a full charge. That’s a massive improvement over most Windows laptops, though still short of the MacBook Air. What’s concerning is that, if the Snapdragon X Elite will indeed run at higher clock speeds at launch, that battery life will likely diminish rapidly.

Based on these results, you’re either looking at lower performance or shorter battery life with the Snapdragon X Elite, but it’s still too soon to say anything conclusive. The first laptops will release next week on June 18, but we recommend waiting for reviews before investing in this yet unproven computing platform.

Editors’ Recommendations










This is the hidden content, please

Computing,Computing,CoPilot,Laptops,qualcomm,Snapdragon X Elite
#iPhone #wont #beat #Snapdragon #Elite

This is the hidden content, please

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.