Exploring online morality in the context of evolved human responses

[Pelican Press 0]

Exploring online morality in the context of evolved human responses

Visual representation of the framework for how the scale and distance afforded by the internet distorts our evolved reactions for compassion for victims and punishment of transgressors in moral interactions. Top left: When the supernormal scale of the internet interacts with people’s instinct to feel compassion for victims of moral transgressions, it can result in compassion fatigue. Top right: when the supernormal distance of the internet interacts with people’s instinct to feel compassion for victims of moral transgressions, it can result in ineffective collective action. Bottom left: When the supernormal scale of the internet interacts with people’s instinct to punish moral transgressors, it can result in public shaming. Bottom right: When the supernormal distance of the internet interacts with people’s instinct to punish moral transgressors, it can result in virtue signaling. Credit: Robertson et al.

In a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in PNAS Nexus, Claire Robertson and colleagues explore how human morality, which evolved in the context of small in-person groups, functions on the internet with over five billion users.

Evolved human responses, such as compassion for victims and urges to punish transgressors, operate differently online, the authors argue. The internet exposes users to large quantities of extreme morally relevant stimuli in the form of 24-hour news and intentionally outrageous content from sometimes physically distant locations.

Subjecting human brains to this new morally oversaturated environment has caused compassion fatigue, public shaming, ineffective collective action and virtue signaling, according to the authors.

Compassion fatigue arises because empathy is a costly cognitive resource, easily overtaxed by the demands of round-the-clock information about suffering. Public shaming arises because the internet makes it all too easy for very large numbers of people to indulge in the universal human ******* to punish wrongdoers, thought to be an evolved adaptation to living in groups—but small groups.

As posting a condemnation is nearly costless, it becomes a tempting way to signal moral virtue and group membership. Real aid may in some cases be replaced by non-costly forms of compassion, such as “liking” or “sharing” a post, which does little to help but makes people feel they have fulfilled their moral responsibilities.

In addition, the ease of organizing online leads to massive—but ephemeral—social movements with shallow roots and little staying power.

The authors call for research into platform design features that sustain attention or engagement without inducing negative externalities on individuals and society, and for greater public access to platform algorithms so that research can proceed.

More information:
Claire E Robertson et al, Morality in the anthropocene: The perversion of compassion and punishment in the online world, PNAS Nexus (2024).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Citation:
Exploring online morality in the context of evolved human responses (2024, June 12)
retrieved 12 June 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Exploring #online #morality #context #evolved #human #responses

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/