Researchers create winning strategy to combat vaccine misinformation on X

[Pelican Press 0]

Researchers create winning strategy to combat vaccine misinformation on X

Examples of user responses to social correction. Here, the social correction is the counter-misinformation reply posted by ordinary users (the second row), and the user response is the reply to the counter-misinformation reply (the third row). Credit: arXiv (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2403.04852

A new in-depth analysis shows that users who reply to misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine on X, formerly known as

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, with a positive attitude, politeness, and strong evidence are more likely to encourage others to disbelieve the incorrect information.

Researchers from three Georgia Tech schools found the most effective way to confront vaccine misinformation on the X platform. They also created a predictive tool to show users whether their reply will succeed in changing minds or backfire and reinforce the misinformation. It can also pinpoint well-meaning replies meant to contradict misinformation but that interfere with social correction.

A research paper with the full findings will be presented this week at the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in Stuttgart, Germany. It is currently

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on the arXiv preprint server.

Like white blood cells attacking a virus, social media users have been known to band together and debunk online misinformation being spread online in a phenomenon researchers call social correction.

The success rate of social correction on most social media sites has not been determined. However, researchers now have a clearer picture of how successful user input can be on X.

Their method uses a blend of artificial intelligence with a dataset of 1.5 million tweets containing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. The researchers then studied user replies to misinformation as well as the consequences of those replies.

In the paper, the researchers write that their data set pre-dates the rollout of X’s community notes feature, which allows users to submit corrections to posts on the platform. They point out that this system restricts users from responding to fact-checking text and labels and does not reflect the large flow of information on the site.

As one of the first taxonomies of user social correction on the X platform, the researchers hope will aid future fact-checking efforts. While the paper only focused on text posts in the English language, it is a framework that can be expanded to address the growing threat of misinformation online.

More information:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

He et al, Corrective or Backfire: Characterizing and Predicting User Response to Social Correction, arXiv (2024).

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Journal information:
arXiv

Provided by
Georgia Institute of Technology

Citation:
Researchers create winning strategy to combat vaccine misinformation on X (2024, June 3)
retrieved 3 June 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Researchers #create #winning #strategy #combat #vaccine #misinformation

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/