Why are organizational cover-ups so common?

[Pelican Press 0]

Why are organizational cover-ups so common?

Credit: sl wong from Pexels

The TV dramatization of the *** Horizon Post Office scandal evoked outrage and disbelief. However, as another example of dysfunctional organizational behavior, it was expected rather than exceptional.

The Post Office saga joins a long list of cover-ups or scandals that includes Hillsborough,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, the infected blood scandal, the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

scandal in the Republic of Ireland, Boeing 737 Max and Nasa (

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

). They represent what happens when there is a move within

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to cover up the causes of a tragedy.

The corporate drive to hide the truth is not random, but, I would say, inevitable. So why does it happen and why is it likely to keep happening?

Charlie Chaplin’s iconic movie Modern Times depicts humans as cogs in the wheel. The movie skewered

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of work movements (for example, that of engineer and author Frederick Taylor), which argued that work must be scientifically analyzed to optimize efficiency. Taylor’s theory stresses that employees should be assigned to perform one specific task, with scientific methods finding the single best way to perform that task. Managers directly supervise employees and employees are paid based on their performance.

The Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution contributed to a ******* to apply scientific management to the organization of work. Taylorism fed directly into our treatment of factory workers as elements in the workflow that needed to be monitored and controlled.

The ghost of Taylorism is evident in our increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to replace human labor. Chaplin understood that the machine metaphor was more than just better technology, it was a kind of template for how people ought to behave.

Stories about scandals vilify the people involved—ex-Post Office boss

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is the most recent example. Individuals do carry responsibility, but blaming bad leaders is easier than accepting that institutions and governments are culpable.

My field (organizational behavior) has contributed to this problem by being servants to industry. The mantra to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

adds a sliver of scientific respectability to the fields of business and management. But it can lead to a ****** spot around how organizational systems can evolve to damage people. Executive behavior in the Enron, Boeing and the *** Post office scandals were motivated by “good” business principles—protecting the company. Protecting institutions can seem ethical.

But organizational scandals are a reminder of what happens when efficiency is championed over personal experiences, and dysfunctional systems are defended. The Horizon Post Office scandal highlighted the worst elements of the scientific management culture in the “efficient” way that the sub-postmasters were hounded.

It was also evident in the delay in getting to the truth because no one would admit that the technology could be wrong. This approach is nothing new. Initially,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

were blamed for Hillsborough, and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

for the problems with Boeing 737 Max.

Can organizations change?

In these scandals, the institutions and corporations skillfully control the narrative until their bubble of ***** or incomplete accounts bursts. Enforced transparency and a fair playing field could break this pattern. A

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, introducing a legally enforceable “duty of candor” for police and public authorities in investigations, and equal legal funding for bereaved families at inquiries and inquests, would be one way to avoid the David versus Goliath journey.

The absence of convictions or meaningful repercussions following almost all scandals is abysmal.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

has a role to play, but wilfully perverting the course of public justice needs to be sanctioned.

We can’t depend on leaders to do the right thing if we keep educating them to put their mission first and people second. We promote and hire on the basis that leaders put their organizations first. The overused explanation of a “bad” culture being responsible for dysfunctional organizations simply means that everybody clearly understood the real vision and objectives, and committed to doing what was needed.

Organizations frequently don’t want to talk about failures or even apparently to learn from them (we can take the Columbia space shuttle and 737 Boeing Max tragedies as examples of this). Similarly,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and whistleblowing rare. The

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is flawed, with ethics and social justice seen as peripheral issues.

Former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells became the face of the scandal.

We need to start by accepting that organizations will do anything to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, and reverse-engineer from this point.

For example, accepting that accidents are likely can protect people from organizational dysfunction. Commercial air travel is one of the safest industries in the world, and the success is based on the fact that plane crashes are impossible to hide. Aviation (like nuclear power operations and chemical industries) are called high-reliability organizations (

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

), which function nearly error-free in extremely challenging and uncertain environments.

The key to HROs is that procedures to protect people are mandatory and strictly enforced by experts. They start from the perspective that accidents are very likely if systems are not in place to prevent them.

Imagine how different the Horizon scandal might have been if the Post Office invited sub-postmasters to collaborate in monitoring the new system for potential flaws when it was introduced.

We don’t need a team of management consultants and policy advisers to understand that new work procedures might not begin perfectly. The biggest lie at the center of most organizational failures—the Horizon Post Office scandal included—is that something unexpected and unpredictable happened.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
Why are organizational cover-ups so common? (2024, May 29)
retrieved 29 May 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#organizational #coverups #common

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/