Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Banning sex crime offenders from changing their names doesn’t make us safer


Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member



Banning **** ****** offenders from changing their names doesn’t make us safer

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

The government of British Columbia recently

This is the hidden content, please
to ban people convicted of serious offenses from legally changing their name. The
This is the hidden content, please
to the province’s Name Act would also prohibit those found not criminally responsible due to mental disorder from changing their name.

The government announced the move after media reports that

This is the hidden content, please
legally changed his name to Ken Johnson. Schoenborn was found
This is the hidden content, please
for the deaths of his children in 2010 because of a delusional disorder, and was placed at a psychiatric hospital.

The amendment bill states that a person is not allowed to change their name if:

  • They have been convicted of a prescribed offense;
  • They’ve been found to be not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder;
  • Or if they’ve been found to be a dangerous or long-term offender.

The ban will also apply to children under 18 who have been convicted of a prescribed offense and are sentenced as adults. This proposed ban is unconstitutional. It diverges from the justice system’s

This is the hidden content, please
and does not make us safer.

Name change bans

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
have banned people convicted of certain **** ******* from changing their names.
This is the hidden content, please
has a bill in the standing committee phase and
This is the hidden content, please
has a proposed bill.
This is the hidden content, please
extended the ban to dangerous and long-term offenders in 2021.

Under section 15(1) of Canada’s

This is the hidden content, please
, “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ******* origin, ******, religion, ****, age or mental or physical disability.”

B.C.’s proposed ban has a host of implications for the Charter rights of a wide range of people. This includes people

This is the hidden content, please
, meaning they were not found guilty. It impacts convicted or not criminally responsible
This is the hidden content, please
seeking a name change to reflect their gender identity. It impacts Indigenous peoples, who are hyper-imprisoned in Canada, who want to
This is the hidden content, please
. Facilitating Indigenous name reclamation is listed under the
This is the hidden content, please
Call to Action 17.

Children sentenced as adults have much potential to live long, meaningful lives post-release, but would also be unable to change their name. Children are more likely to engage in risky and impulsive behaviors due to human

This is the hidden content, please
. It also has implications for convicted gang members trying to break ties or prevent retribution, and people seeking to change their last name after getting married or as part of other religious or spiritual commitment ceremonies.

Undermining reintegration

Changing identity is part of reintegration for many.

This is the hidden content, please
means developing a ******-free identity to live a meaningful life as a contributing member of society. It entails recovering one’s “core good self” and constructing a positive narrative about the future. It also means “generativity”; this is, giving back to society.

Desistance has important connections to

This is the hidden content, please
. Barriers to desistance include the difficulty of gaining education, employment, housing and social acceptance. Banning name changes may further isolate convicted people or people found not criminally responsible, making it more difficult or
This is the hidden content, please
.

Canada’s justice system is mandated to support

This is the hidden content, please
. The vast majority of people in prison have a release date and will return to the community after serving time. B.C.”s proposed bill extends punishment beyond the formal sentence, and works against purported goals of rehabilitation and reintegration.

Banning legal name changes will not make us safer. Canada’s ********* legal system has checks in place to assess the potential risk an individual could pose to the public upon and after release, including the parole system. Name changes also do not impact a person’s ********* record, which allows employers, schools and other organizations to learn about someone’s ********* history.

Supporting desistance

Rather than banning name changes in an effort to seek public safety, the focus should be on supporting desistance. To do so means helping people to rejoin society, including wrap-around supports for people who have been convicted or not criminally responsible.

For example, the non-profit

This is the hidden content, please
is focused on providing social support to help people rejoin communities, but only exists in 15 locations throughout Canada. The program has contributed to a
This is the hidden content, please
in all forms of recidivism, showing that guided community support greatly improves outcomes for former prisoners.

Rather than ban name changes in an effort to seek accountability, governments must invest in

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
justice. Restorative justice focuses on rehabilitation of the person who did harm and reconciliation for their victims. It centers on repairing harm, the potential for healing, meaningful accountability and preventing further offending.

What

This is the hidden content, please
looks like is determined with victims, and the person who did harm is required to acknowledge or accept responsibility for their actions in order to access these programs.

Overall, name change bans are a step in the wrong direction. To support public safety and accountability, greater investment should be placed in community supported reintegration and restorative and transformative justice options.

Provided by
The Conversation


This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please
under a Creative Commons license. Read the
This is the hidden content, please
.

Citation:
Viewpoint: Banning **** ****** offenders from changing their names doesn’t make us safer (2024, May 27)
retrieved 27 May 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.







This is the hidden content, please

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Banning #**** #****** #offenders #changing #names #doesnt #safer

This is the hidden content, please

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.