US says Israel’s use of US arms likely violated international law, but evidence is incomplete

[Pelican Press 0]

US says *******’s use of US arms likely violated international law, but evidence is incomplete

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration said Friday that *******’s use of U.S.-provided weapons in Gaza likely violated international humanitarian law but wartime conditions prevented U.S. officials from determining that for certain in specific airstrikes.

The finding of “reasonable” evidence to conclude that the U.S. ally had breached international law in its conduct of the war in Gaza, released in a summary of a report being delivered to Congress on Friday, represents the strongest such statement from Biden officials.

But the caveat that the U.S. was unable immediately to link specific U.S. weapons to individual strikes by ******** forces in Gaza could give the administration leeway in any future decision on whether to restrict provisions of offensive weapons to *******.

The first-of-its-kind assessment, which was compelled by President Joe Biden’s fellow Democrats in Congress, comes after seven months of airstrikes, ground fighting and aid restrictions that have claimed the lives of nearly 35,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

While U.S. officials were unable to gather all the information they needed on specific strikes, “given *******’s significant reliance on U.S.-made defense articles, it is reasonable to assess that defense articles … have been used by ******** security forces since October 7 in instances inconsistent with its IHL obligations or with established best practices for mitigating civilian harm,” the report said, using an abbreviation for international humanitarian law.

While *******’s military has the experience, technology and know-how to minimize harm to civilians, “the results on the ground, including high levels of civilian casualties, raise substantial questions as to whether the IDF is using them effectively in all cases,” the report said.

Biden has tried to walk an ever-finer line in his support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s war against ******. He has faced growing rancor at home and abroad over the soaring ************ ****** toll and the onset of famine, caused in large part by ******** restrictions on the movement of food and aid into Gaza. Tensions have been heightened further in recent weeks by Netanyahu’s pledge to expand the ******** military’s offensive in the crowded southern city of Rafah, despite Biden’s adamant opposition.

Biden is in the closing months of a tough reelection campaign against Donald Trump. He faces demands from many Democrats that he cut the flow of offensive weapons to ******* and denunciation from Republicans who accuse him of wavering on support for ******* at its time of need.

The Democratic administration took one of the first steps toward conditioning military aid to ******* in recent days when it paused a shipment of 3,500 ****** out of concern over *******’s threatened offensive on Rafah, a southern city crowded with more than a million Palestinians, a senior administration official said.

The presidential directive, agreed to in February, obligated the Defense and State departments to conduct “an assessment of any credible reports or allegations that such defense articles and, as appropriate, defense services, have been used in a manner not consistent with international law, including international humanitarian law.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

also obligated them to tell Congress whether they deemed that ******* has acted to “arbitrarily to deny, restrict, or otherwise impede, directly or indirectly,” delivery of any U.S.-supported humanitarian aid into Gaza for starving civilians there.

Lawmakers and others who advocated for the review said Biden and previous ********* leaders have followed a double standard when enforcing U.S. laws governing how foreign militaries use U.S. support, an accusation the Biden administration denies. They had urged the administration to make a straightforward legal determination of whether there was credible evidence that specific ******** airstrikes on schools, crowded neighborhoods, medical workers, aid convoys and other targets, and restrictions on aid shipments into Gaza, violated the laws of war and human rights.

Their opponents argued that a U.S. finding against ******* would weaken it at a time it is battling ****** and other Iran-backed groups. Any sharply critical findings on ******* are sure to add to pressure on Biden to curb the flow of weapons and money to *******’s military and further heighten tensions with Netanyahu’s hard-right government over its conduct of the war against ******.

Any finding against ******* also could endanger Biden’s support in this year’s presidential elections from some voters who keenly support *******.

At the time the White House agreed to the review, it was working to head off moves from Democratic lawmakers and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont to start restricting shipments of weapons to *******.

******* launched its offensive after an Oct. 7 ******** into *******, led by ******, ******* about 1,200 people. Two-thirds of the Palestinians ******* since then have been women and children, according to local health officials. U.S. and U.N. officials say ******** restrictions on food shipments since Oct. 7 have brought on full-fledged famine in northern Gaza.

Human rights groups long have accused ******** security forces of committing abuses against Palestinians and have accused ******** leaders of failing to hold those responsible to account. In January, in a case brought by South *******, the top U.N. court ordered ******* to do all it could to prevent ******, destruction and any acts of genocide in Gaza, but the panel stopped short of ordering an end to the military offensive.

******* says it is following all U.S. and international law, that it investigates allegations of ****** by its security forces and that its campaign in Gaza is proportional to the existential threat it says is posed by ******.

Biden in December said “indiscriminate ********” was costing ******* international backing. After ******** forces targeted and ******* seven aid workers from the World Central Kitchen in April, the Biden administration for the first time signaled it might cut military aid to ******* if it didn’t change its handling of the war and humanitarian aid.

Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, in the 1980s and early 1990s, were the last presidents to openly hold back weapons or military financing to try to push ******* to change its actions in the region or toward Palestinians.

A report to the Biden administration by an unofficial, self-formed panel including military experts, academics and former State Department officials detailed ******** strikes on aid convoys, journalists, hospitals, schools and ******** centers and other sites. They argued that the civilian ****** toll in those strikes — such as an Oct. 31 strike on an apartment building reported to have ******* 106 civilians — was disproportionate to the ***** against any military target.

—-

Zeke Miller and Mike Balsamo contributed.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

International agreements, *******, Joe Biden, *******-****** war, War and unrest, General news, ************ territories government, World news, Washington news, ******* government, w, Gaza Strip, Benjamin Netanyahu, ******* States government, Government and politics, Donald Trump, Politics, World News
#Israels #arms #violated #international #law #evidence #incomplete

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up