US drone warfare faces questions of legitimacy, study of military chaplains shows

[Pelican Press 0]

US drone warfare faces questions of legitimacy, study of military chaplains shows

Are drone strikes legitimate, meaning on sound moral and legal footing? How people perceive the legitimacy of U.S. drone strikes—******* missiles from remotely piloted aircraft at ********** and insurgent leaders—is

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

The ********* public

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

military action it

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, and U.S. policymakers often reference the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. The U.S. military, responsible for conducting most drone strikes globally, has also

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

as a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Yet what shapes perceptions of legitimate drone warfare, how these perceptions vary across audiences, and the implications for the U.S. drone program

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. This gap is surprising, given that “over-the-horizon” drone strikes—******* missiles at targets many miles away—have defined U.S. counterterrorism policy

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, despite being

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Drone strikes differ from other uses of force in the remoteness of the operators ******* the weapons. Drone operators are typically hundreds or thousands of miles away from their targets, which they view through drone- and satellite-based cameras and sensors. In the worst-case scenario, this can lead to target misidentification and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Part of the problem is that scholars disagree on what constitutes drone warfare, which has implications for how they understand variations in public perceptions of legitimacy. As military scholars

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, we

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

as a function of strike attributes, meaning how and why they are used abroad.

Using this definition, we have found that how a country uses and constrains the use of drones shapes how people perceive their legitimacy. We’ve also found that perceptions of legitimacy differ between U.S. citizens and soldiers, particularly chaplains, who guide the moral use of force. We are scheduled to present our study of the attitudes of military chaplains on drone strikes at both the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and the ********* Political Science Association’s

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in September 2024.

A U.S. drone strike in Iraq ******* members of an Iranian-backed militia.

Uses and constraints

Countries use drones for different purposes.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

strikes are designed to achieve battlefield objectives, such as destroying an ****** compound.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

******** ********** organizations to achieve overall war aims. They are used to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. The goal of such “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” is to hasten a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Countries also constrain drone use differently. Some use self-imposed constraints. These include

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, which are

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

effectiveness against

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Others use externally imposed constraints such as

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

U.S. citizens’ beliefs

Drawing on our definition of drone warfare as a matter of varying uses and constraints of drones, we reviewed and analyzed

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

We found that U.S. citizens perceive over-the-horizon drone strikes, where drones are used strategically without external oversight, as most legitimate. This pattern of drone warfare characterizes the ******* States’

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

One of the authors gave a presentation about a book he co-wrote that examines public perceptions of the legitimacy of drone warfare.

However, we also found that U.S. citizens’ perceptions of legitimacy are affected by civilian casualties, which lead Americans to reconsider reliance on internal constraints such as targeting standards. Given civilian casualties, U.S. citizens’ perceptions of legitimacy are shaped by international, rather than national, oversight, reflecting a belief that international approval

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

U.S. Army chaplains’ beliefs

We compared these results with the beliefs of U.S. Army chaplains, offering the first evidence for how these key advisers to military commanders perceive the legitimacy of drone warfare.

The U.S. Army conducts the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Chaplains in the Army are “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” during conflict who “provide professional advice, counsel, and instruction on religious, moral, and ethical issues,”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Many commanders in the military

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, suggesting they may draw on chaplains’ counsel. Similarly, chaplains minister to drone operators, who are vulnerable to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, meaning the emotional or psychological damage people suffer when they transgress their moral boundaries.

Some experts suspect that chaplains’ advisory role

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. These scholars often study chaplains during interstate war, however. Our research sheds new light on chaplains’ attitudes toward the use of drones against nonstate adversaries such as ********** organizations.

We found that, in contrast to the U.S. public, chaplains perceive over-the-horizon drone strikes as illegitimate. Rather, chaplains perceive tactical-level strikes on the battlefield as most legitimate, especially when they are

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

by policy.

Even then, chaplains voice less support for these drone strikes than their perceptions of legitimacy might suggest. Why would chaplains not support drone strikes they perceive as legitimate? We found that this “legitimacy paradox” reflects underlying concerns. Chaplains in our survey often questioned the legality of strikes, the veracity of intelligence, the territorial integrity of targeted countries and the implications for national security.

A 2011 U.S. drone strike ******* Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen, sparking debate about the legitimacy of the *******.

The future of US drone warfare

These findings have implications for policy, strategy and military readiness. In order to increase perceptions of legitimacy of the U.S. drone program among citizens and soldiers, our findings suggest that elected and military leaders would need to take several steps.

First, elected officials would need to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Specifically, they would need to justify a transgression of a country’s sovereignty, especially in terms of anticipated security gains.

Second, military leaders would need to explain the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, measures to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, and how strikes

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Finally, military leaders would need to research the potential for differences in perceptions of legitimacy held by other soldiers, especially with the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that can identify, track and engage targets without human oversight.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, for instance, also fulfill a key advisory role to commanders. Lawyers’

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, shaped more by their understanding of the laws of armed conflict rather than moral considerations, suggests that it is possible they may interpret the legitimacy of drone strikes differently than chaplains.

In our expert opinion, taking these steps would bring the necessary transparency and reflection to address questions of legitimacy that are fundamental to civilian and military support for the U.S. drone program.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
US drone warfare faces questions of legitimacy, study of military chaplains shows (2024, May 9)
retrieved 9 May 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#drone #warfare #faces #questions #legitimacy #study #military #chaplains #shows

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/