Ubisoft’s Future Might Depend on a Risk They’ve Never Fully Taken

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Ubisoft’s Future Might Depend on a Risk They’ve Never Fully Taken

Ubisoft has long relied on a steady stream of AAA titles to stay afloat, but that strategy isn’t working anymore. Star Wars Outlaws underperformed, and even the solid sales of Assassin’s Creed Shadows weren’t enough to lift the studio out of its creative and financial slump.

Now, with rumors of various remakes coming our way, including a potentially imminent Splinter Cell remake, fans are wondering if the studio’s salvation lies not in the next big thing, but in revisiting the classics it helped define in the first place.

Ubisoft: A studio in search of its soul

Ubisoft has spent years chasing trends, live service games, massive RPGs, and cinematic universes. But in doing so, it seems to have lost touch with what made it special to begin with.

Its early franchises didn’t just follow trends; they created them. Titles like the original Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, and the early Assassin’s Creed games were masterclasses in genre innovation.

Now, the company finds itself in a creative rut, with players growing tired of formulaic open-world gameplay and bloated experiences. Critical acclaim has dwindled, financial reports have been underwhelming, and morale among both developers and fans feels precarious.

In that context, the rumored Splinter Cell remake,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

looking “genuinely impressive” according to Tom Henderson, could be more than just another title on the release calendar. It could be a turning point.

Why? Because Ubisoft has always approached its remakes a tad bit too cautiously, almost half-heartedly. The Prince of Persia remake gets delayed multiple times. Hints of an Assassin’s Creed remake have never truly materialized.

Even the Splinter Cell remake, recently

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, was originally announced in 2021. In many ways, the studio has flirted with nostalgia but never fully embraced it. But this is its chance or gamble to find something new for itself.

A new identity built on old foundations?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

On the surface, remakes might seem like a safe bet: take a beloved classic, give it a fresh coat of paint, and release it to a nostalgic audience. But the reality is far more complicated. A remake isn’t just about modern graphics or updated controls.

For it to truly resonate, it needs to strike a delicate balance: respecting the original while introducing enough innovation to feel relevant today. Otherwise, it risks alienating both longtime fans and new players. That’s where the real challenge lies for Ubisoft.

A lazy or overly faithful remake of Splinter Cell won’t cut it. What the studio needs is something that reimagines the experience, something bold enough to redefine stealth gameplay for a modern audience, while still honoring the atmosphere, tension, and intelligence that made the original iconic.

Because the truth is, Ubisoft isn’t just trying to revive a game. It’s trying to rebuild trust. Right now, the studio isn’t in the best standing with its community. Its recent offerings haven’t been outright failures, but they haven’t sparked much excitement either.

A well-executed Splinter Cell remake, just like the insiders are hinting at, could bring new life not just to the series but to the studio as a whole.

It could mark the beginning of a new identity: one that values focus over scale, creativity over routine, and respect for its own legacy. And that’s exactly what the studio desperately needs right now.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Ubisofts #Future #Depend #Risk #Theyve #Fully

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

0

• Quote