Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member

Opinion | The Biden-Netanyahu divide goes much deeper than Rafah

As the war in Gaza grinds on, President Biden and ******** Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are locked in a public quarrel about military strategy, political leadership and even casualty numbers. Like past disputes in the relationship, this one will probably be resolved short of an open break — but it’s a tense moment.

The most visible disagreement has been about Netanyahu’s plan to ******* ******’s remaining stronghold in Rafah along Gaza’s southern border with Egypt. Netanyahu and a broad range of other ******** officials believe that destroying the four ****** battalions there, with about 3,000 fighters, is essential to break its military control in the territory.

Biden said in an interview with MSNBC this past weekend that Rafah was a “red line,” but it wasn’t clear just what that meant. Last month, Biden said ******* shouldn’t ******* Rafah until it had a “credible and executable plan for ensuring the safety” of more than 1 million ************ refugees who have been driven there by the fighting, according to

This is the hidden content, please
. Administration officials say they still haven’t seen such a plan.

“We’ll go there,” Netanyahu shot back on Sunday, adding: “You know, I have a red line. You know what the red line is? That October 7 doesn’t happen again. Never happens again.” A senior ******** official underlined that position in an interview on Wednesday. “If the administration says, ‘Never do Rafah,’ that won’t work. … You can’t do 80 percent of the job.”

But there might be less to the Rafah quarrel than it appears. ******* has promised the Biden administration that it will prepare a careful operational plan that includes protection of Palestinians and more humanitarian assistance. The ******* Defense Forces won’t move forward without a detailed tactical scenario that has been shared with the White House.

“We won’t suddenly invade Rafah. It takes time to prepare a plan,” explains the senior ******** official. ******** officials won’t discuss how long this planning might take. But it seems likely to require weeks, and it could even stretch past the end of the ******* holy month of Ramadan in April. In any event, a Rafah confrontation doesn’t seem imminent.

A deeper disagreement is about whether Netanyahu and his right-wing government really have ******* the country behind a clear endgame for the conflict. U.S. intelligence analysts were openly skeptical of Netanyahu’s leadership prospects in

This is the hidden content, please
, delivered to Congress this week.

“Netanyahu’s viability as a leader as well as his governing coalition of far-right and ultraorthodox parties that pursued hardline policies on ************ and security issues may be in jeopardy,” the threat assessment noted. “Distrust of Netanyahu’s ability to rule has deepened and broadened. … A different, more moderate government is a possibility.”

That’s unusually blunt language for a public intelligence report, and ******** officials protested what they saw as an effort to meddle in ******** internal politics by, in effect, “weaponizing” the intelligence reporting. Netanyahu’s team was already peeved about what it saw as an attempt by Vice President Harris to drive a wedge into ******** politics when she said

This is the hidden content, please
: “It’s important to distinguish and to not conflate the ******** government with the ******** people.”

What’s happening here is that long-standing private disputes are becoming public. For months, administration officials have explored ways they might prod other ******** leaders, such as former army chief of staff Benny Gantz, to challenge Netanyahu, who polls show is deeply unpopular at home. But trying to steer political outcomes with a democratic ally can easily backfire.

The most fundamental disagreement is about the state of the war itself. Netanyahu speaks as though victory is close. That’s why he wants to take Rafah soon and, in his mind, be done with it. But U.S. officials think ******* is overestimating the damage it has done to ******, and doubt that Netanyahu still has a pathway for securing Gaza and stabilizing the region, even if he demolishes the four battalions in Rafah.

Here, again, the U.S. intelligence community offered a pointed assessment in Monday’s testimony: “******* probably will face lingering armed resistance from ****** for years to come, and the military will struggle to neutralize ******’s underground infrastructure.”

******** officials offer detailed statistics to back their claim that the war has been effective. When the fighting began, ****** and other militias had about 35,000 fighters; of those, more than 25,000 have been *******, captured or injured, the officials said. Of the smaller subset of ****** regular fighters, they said 12,000 have been taken off the battlefield, including about 60 percent of battalion commanders.

U.S. intelligence estimates project “far fewer” ****** casualties, a U.S. official said. That’s in part because the ******* States counts battlefield casualties differently. But there’s a stark difference between ******** and ********* evaluations of the campaign.

The tunnel war has been the most vexing part of the Gaza ********. ******** officials say they spent weeks devising tactics to ******* a vast network of zigs and zags that they estimate is 380 miles long, all within a territory just 25 miles long and up to 7½ miles wide. ******** officials say they’ve destroyed about 60 percent of ******’s command-and-control facilities in the tunnels and 90 percent of its ******* arsenal of rockets, which totaled 15,000 to 20,000 when the war began.

But ******* officials concede they’ve only begun destroying ******’s underground empire. Less than 30 percent of the tunnels have been captured, several officials said. And even now, ****** still is operating smuggling tunnels into Egypt.

Finally, on the baseline question of what Gaza will look like “the day after,” U.S. and ******** officials agree there is still no clear answer. That’s one reason Biden mistrusts Netanyahu. The White House doubts the ******** leader has a sound strategy for ending a conflict that has brutalized *******, has had a shattering effect on ************ civilians and is increasingly harmful to U.S. interests around the world.



This is the hidden content, please

partner-exclude
#Opinion #BidenNetanyahu #divide #deeper #Rafah

This is the hidden content, please


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.