How Lucy Connolly’s racist tweet sparked a free speech row

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

How Lucy Connolly’s racist tweet sparked a free speech row

Ben Schofield

BBC political correspondent, East of England

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

X.com

Lucy Connolly called for hotels housing asylum seekers to be set on fire and wrote “if that makes me racist, so be it”

Lucy Connolly’s 51-word online post in the wake of the Southport killings led her to jail and into the centre of a row over free speech.

For some, the 31-month jail term imposed for inciting race hate was “tyrannical”, while one commentator said Connolly was a “hostage of the British state”, and another that she was “clearly a political prisoner”.

Court of Appeal judges, however, this week refused to reduce her sentence.

Asked about her case in Parliament,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

sentencing was “a matter for the courts” and that while he was “strongly in favour of free speech”, he was “equally against incitement to violence”.

Rupert Lowe, the independent MP for Great Yarmouth, said the situation was

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and added: “This is not the Britain I want to live in.”

Others said her supporters wanted a “right to be racist”.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Connolly’s legal team argued her sentence was “manifestly excessive” but the Court of Appeal disagreed

Warning: This report contains racist and discriminatory language

In July last year, prompted by a false rumour that an ******** immigrant was responsible for the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, Connolly posted online calling for “mass deportation now”, adding “set fire to all the… hotels [housing asylum seekers]… for all I care”.

Connolly, then a 41-year-old Northampton childminder, added: “If that makes me racist, so be it.”

At the time she had about 9,000 followers on X. Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times, before she deleted it three and a half hours later.

In October she was jailed after admitting inciting racial hatred.

Three appeal court judges

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

the 31-month sentence was not “manifestly excessive”.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Connolly’s appeal was paid for by the Free Speech Union, founded by Lord Toby Young (holding left edge of the banner)

Stephen O’Grady, a legal officer with the Free Speech Union (FSU), said the sentence seemed “rather steep in proportion to the offence”.

His organisation has worked with Connolly’s family since November and funded her appeal.

Mr O’Grady said Connolly “wasn’t some lager-fuelled hooligan on the streets” and pointed to her being a mother of a 12-year-old daughter, who had also lost a son when he was just 19 months old.

He said there was a “difference between howling racist abuse at somebody in the street and throwing bricks at the police” and “sending tweets, which were perhaps regrettable but wouldn’t have the same immediate effect”.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Stephen O’Grady said Connolly’s case demonstrated “police overreach”

Connolly’s case was also “emblematic of wider concerns” about “increasing police interest in people’s online activity”, Mr O’Grady said.

The FSU had received “a slew of queries” from people who were “very unsure” about “the limits of what they can they can say online”, he said, and who feared “the police are going to come knocking on the door”.

“There’s an immense amount of police overreach,” he added.

He cited the example of a retired special constable detained after

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a case the FSU took on.

Responding to Mr O’Grady’s claim, a National Police Chiefs’ Council spokesperson said that Article 10 of the Human Rights Act “protects a person’s right to hold opinions and to express them freely” and that officers received training about the act.

They added: “It remains imperative that officers and staff continue to receive training commensurate with the demands placed upon them.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Raymond Connolly said the Court of Appeal had shown his wife “no mercy”

After the appeal was dismissed, Connolly’s husband, Conservative town councillor Raymond Connolly, said she was “a good person and not a racist” and had “paid a very high price for making a mistake”.

Her local Labour MP, Northampton South’s Mike Reader, said he had “big sympathy” for Connolly and her daughter, but there was no justification for accusing the police of “overreach”.

He said: “I want the police to protect us online and I want the police to protect us on the streets and they should be doing it equally.”

It was a “fallacy” and “misunderstanding of the world” if people did not “believe that the online space is as dangerous for people as the streets,” he added.

“We’re all attached to our phones; we’re all influenced by what we see, and I think it’s right that the police took action here.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Connolly had pleaded guilty but argued at appeal she had not intended to incite serious violence

In his

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, Judge Melbourne Inman said Connolly’s offence was “category A” – meaning “high culpability” – and that both the prosecution and her own barrister agreed she “intended to incite serious violence”.

For Reader, this showed “they weren’t arguing this was a silly tweet and she should be let off – her own counsel agreed this was a serious issue”.

At her appeal, Connolly claimed that while she accepted she intended to stir up racial hatred, she always denied trying to incite violence.

But Lord Justice Holroyde said

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

the evidence “clearly shows that she was well aware of what she was admitting”.

Sentencing guidelines for the offence indicate a starting point of three years’ custody.

While the prosecution argued the offence was aggravated by its timing, “particularly sensitive social climate”, the defence argued the tweet had been posted before any violence had started, and that Connolly had “subsequently attempted to stop the violence after it had erupted”.

The judgement also highlighted other online posts from Connolly that the judges said indicated her “view about ******** immigrants”.

Four days before the Southport murders, she responded to a video shared by far-right activist Tommy Robinson showing a ****** man being tackled to the ground for allegedly performing a sex act in public.

Connolly posted: “Somalian, I guess. Loads of them,” followed by a vomiting emoji.

On 3 August, responding to an anti-racism protest in Manchester, she wrote: “I take it they will all be in line to sign up to house an ******** boat invader then. Oh sorry, refugee.

“Maybe sign a waiver to say they don’t mind if it’s one of their family that gets attacked, butchered, ****** etc, by unvetted criminals.”

The FSU said she was likely to be eligible for release from August, after serving 40% of her sentence.

Some, including Mr O’Grady, argued her jail term was longer than punishments handed to criminals perceived to have committed “far worse” crimes.

Reform ***’s Mark Arnull, the leader of West Northamptonshire Council, said it was not for him “to pass comment on sentences or indeed discuss individual cases”.

But he added: “It’s relatively easy to understand why constituents in West Northamptonshire question the proportionality of Lucy’s sentence when they see offenders in other high-profile and serious cases walk free and avoid jail.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Shola Mos-Shogbamimu believed Connolly’s supporters wanted a “right to be racist”

The issue for writer and activist Shola Mos-Shogbamimu was that “those who have committed worse crimes” should “spend more time in jail, not less time for Lucy Connolly”.

Dr Mos-Shogbamimu added: “It’s not ‘freedom of speech without accountability’. She didn’t tweet something that hurt someone’s feelings; she tweeted saying someone should die.”

In her view, those making Connolly a “flag-bearer or champion” for free speech were asking for “the right to be racist”.

Free speech advocate Mr O’Grady said “no-one is arguing for an unfettered ‘right’ to incite racial hatred”.

Connolly’s case was about “proportionality”, he added, and “the sense that online speech is increasingly being punished very harshly compared to other offending… such as in-person violent disorder”.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Lucy #Connollys #racist #tweet #sparked #free #speech #row

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up