Birkenstock sandals are not art, says German court

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Birkenstock sandals are not art, says ******* court

Birkenstocks may be cool enough for Barbie but the sandals do not qualify as works of art, a ******* court has ruled.

The company had claimed that its footwear could be classified as art and so was protected by copyright laws, and brought the case to stop rivals selling copycat versions of its cork-soled sandals.

But a judge dismissed the claim, saying the shoes were practical design items.

Birkenstocks were once deemed uncool but in recent years have become hugely popular, and gained more attention after actress Margot Robbie wore a pink pair of the sandals in the final scene of the 2023 hit Barbie movie.

The sandals, which feature a moulded footbed, have been praised for being comfortable and sturdy, and many colour options and strap styles have evolved since the original leather-strapped version in the 1960s.

Even though it was initially rejected from the catwalks, it soon became a fashionable item, scoring a seal of approval from supermodel Kate Moss in the 1990s, and even appeared on celebrity feet at the Academy Awards.

The company eventually

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, valuing the firm at roughly $8.6bn (£7.08bn) – double its worth in 2021.

Birkenstocks’ popularity means rivals often sell knock-off versions, prompting the firm to make the claim to protect what it called its “iconic design”.

******* law distinguishes between design and art when it comes to a product. Design serves a practical purpose, whereas works of art need to show a certain amount of individual creativity.

Art is covered by copyright protection, which lasts for 70 years after the creator’s death, whereas design protection last for 25 years from when the filing was made.

Shoemaker Karl Birkenstock, born in the 1930s, is still alive. Since some of his sandals no longer enjoy design protection, the firm attempted to gain copyright protection by seeking to classify its footwear as art.

But the claim was “unfounded”, presiding judge Thomas Koch said.

His ruling added that for copyright protection, “a degree of design must be achieved that shows individuality”.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Birkenstock #sandals #art #******* #court

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up