Google Must Face Mobile Phone Privacy Class Action, Possible Trial

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Must Face Mobile Phone Privacy Class Action, Possible Trial

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

failed to persuade a federal judge to dismiss a privacy class action claiming it collected personal data from people’s cellphones after they switched off a button to stop the tracking, paving the way for a possible August trial.

Chief Judge Richard Seeborg of the federal court in San Francisco rejected arguments that the search engine company adequately disclosed how its Web and App Activity settings worked, and that users consented to the tracking.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

had also argued that its basic record-keeping “doesn’t hurt anyone.”

Users of Android and non-Android mobile devices accused

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of invading their privacy and violating a California law against unauthorised fraudulent computer access by intercepting and saving their personal browsing histories without consent.

In a 20-page decision on Tuesday, Seeborg said reasonable users could view

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s conduct as “highly offensive,” because the company collected data despite fielding concerns from several employees and knowing its disclosures were ambiguous.

He cited internal communications suggesting that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a unit of Alphabet, was intentionally vague in distinguishing between data collected inside and outside

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

accounts because users might find the truth “alarming.”

On the other hand, Seeborg said the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

employees might simply have been suggesting ways to improve the Mountain View, California-based company’s products and services.

“Whether

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

or plaintiffs’ interpretation prevails is a triable issue of fact,” he wrote.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

said in a statement on Wednesday: “Privacy controls have long been built into our service and the allegations here are a deliberate attempt to mischaracterise the way our products work. We will continue to make our case in court against these patently false claims.”

Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A jury trial is scheduled for August 18. The lawsuit began in July 2020.

Last August, the federal appeals court in San Francisco revived a lawsuit accusing

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of tracking Chrome browser users after they chose not to synchronise their browsers with their

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

accounts.

Four months earlier,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

agreed to destroy billions of data records to settle a lawsuit claiming it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including on Chrome browsers set to “Incognito” mode.

Law firms representing the plaintiffs in that case valued that settlement at more than $5 billion (roughly Rs. 42,937 crore). The same firms represent the plaintiffs in the current case.

The case is Rodriguez et al v

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

LLC, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-04688.

© Thomson Reuters 2025

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Face #Mobile #Phone #Privacy #Class #Action #Trial

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up