Note to No 10: one speed doesn’t fit all when it comes to online safety | John Naughton

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Note to No 10: one speed doesn’t fit all when it comes to online safety | John Naughton

London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed (

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

) is an admirable online community of fixed-gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London. Sadly, this columnist does not qualify for membership: he doesn’t reside in (or near) the metropolis, and he requires a number of gears to tackle even the gentlest of inclines – and therefore admires hardier cyclists who disdain the assistance of Sturmey-Archer or Campagnolo hardware.

There is, however, bad news on the horizon. After Sunday 16 March, LFGSS will be no more. Dee Kitchen, the software wizard (and cyclist) who is the core developer of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, a platform for running non-commercial, non-profit, privacy-sensitive, accessible online forums such as LFGSS, has

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that on that date he will “delete the virtual servers hosting LFGSS and other communities, and effectively immediately end the approximately 300 small communities that I run, and the few large communities such as LFGSS”.

Why will Kitchen be doing this? Answer: he’s read

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

published on 16 December by Ofcom, the regulator appointed by the government to implement the provisions of the Online Safety Act (OSA). It says: “Providers now have a duty to assess the risk of ******** harms on their services, with a deadline of 16 March 2025. Subject to the codes completing the parliamentary process, from 17 March 2025, providers will need to take the safety measures set out in the codes or use other effective measures to protect users from ******** content and activity. We are ready to take enforcement action if providers do not act promptly to address the risks on their services.”

Hang on: isn’t the OSA just about protecting children and adults from harmful content, bullying, ************, etc – not discussions about fixed-gear bikes, ******* support, dog-walking, rebuilding valve amplifiers and the like? Well, bizarre though it sounds, the answer seems to be no. The

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

services that handle user-generated content to have baseline content moderation practices, use those moderation practices to take down reported content that violates *** law, and stop kids from seeing porn. And it applies to every service which handles user-generated content and has “links to the ***”.

In these circumstances, the costs of being an early test case would give anyone pause

Kitchen believes that the online forums he hosts fall within the scope of the act and that he has “no way to dodge it” because he’s based in the ***. “I can’t afford what is likely tens of thousand to go through all the legal and technical hoops here over a prolonged ******* of time … the site itself barely gets a few hundred in donations each month and costs a little more to run … this is not a venture that can afford compliance costs … and if we did, what remains is a disproportionately high personal liability for me, and one that could easily be weaponised by disgruntled people who are banned for their egregious behaviour.” Which is why he sees no alternative to shuttering the platform.

Some people will think that he’s overreacting, that common sense will prevail and that in due course legal precedents will emerge from court cases. But the OSA is a new statute – and one that had a tortuous evolution from a 2019 white paper on online harms and a chaotic passage through parliament at a time when the Tories were busy mismanaging the country. (One grizzled political insider described it to me as “a dog’s breakfast”.) In such circumstances, the costs of being an early test case would give anyone pause. I’ve been a blogger for decades and decided from the outset not to allow comments on

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

partly because I didn’t want the burden of moderating them, but also because I worried about the legal implications of what people might post. So in Kitchen’s place I would be inclined to do what he has decided to do.

Many years ago, I had an exchange at a Royal Society conference with Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the world wide web. I had just come from a conversation with a senior New Labour minister in which it had dawned on me that this man thinks that the web is the internet!, and I told Tim about it. “It’s much worse than that,” he replied, “millions of people across the world think that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is the internet.”

The root of the problems with the OSA is that it was framed and enacted by legislators who think that the “internet” consists only of the platforms of a small number of huge tech corporations. So they passed a statute that supposedly would deal with these corporate miscreants – without imagining what the unintended consequences would be on the actual internet of people using the technology for genuinely social purposes. And in doing so they have inadvertently raised the question famously posed by Alexander Pope in 1735 in his letter to Dr Arbuthnot: “Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?”

What I’ve been reading

English students in peril
Nathan Heller’s

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on the flight from the humanities in American universities.

skip past newsletter promotion

Analysis and opinion on the week’s news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

reCaptcha to protect our website and the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

apply.

after newsletter promotion

Don’t delegate your life away
Really nuanced

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on what we in the AI age can learn from the 20th-century cultural critic Lewis Mumford.

Musk, meet Ross Perot
Sharp piece by John Ganz on

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

• Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 250 words to be considered for publication, email it to us at *****@*****.tld.***

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Note #speed #doesnt #fit #online #safety #John #Naughton

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up