TechScape: Why the US wants to force Google to sell Chrome | Technology

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

TechScape: Why the US wants to force

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to sell Chrome | Technology

Google is in trouble. As my colleague Dan Milmo reported, the US Department of Justice “has proposed a far-reaching overhaul of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s structure and business practices, including the ***** of its Chrome browser, in a bid to end its monopoly on internet search”. The move follows a major court ruling last August in which a federal judge determined that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

had violated antitrust laws and held an ******** monopoly over search services. The justice department’s suggestion is blunt: “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

must divest Chrome.” As for Android, the DoJ proposes two potential remedies: divest or submit to government oversight.

Both demands present seismic challenges to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s multiform, money-printing advertising business and would be a worst-case scenario for the company.

In an aggressively defensive

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s chief legal officer, Kent Walker, called the justice department’s proposals “staggering”, “extreme”, and “unprecedented government overreach”. Walker can’t have an easy job right now. The company plans to file its own proposals next month and appeal its original loss in court. Still, Walker’s tone was, at times, almost comically histrionic: “As just one example, DoJ’s proposal would literally require us to install not one but two separate choice screens before you could access

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

search on a Pixel phone you bought.” Not one, but two separate choice screens??!!

The justice department’s says its goal is to increase competition. Its attorneys wrote in a court filing: “A remedy for

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s unlawful monopolization must simultaneously (1) unfetter these markets from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s exclusionary conduct; (2) pry them open to competition; (3) deny

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

the fruits of its statutory violations; and (4) prevent

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

from monopolizing these and related markets in the future.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

search is the cornerstone of the company’s lucrative ad business; Chrome is the second stone. It is the most popular browser in the world, boasting a market share of almost two-thirds of people using the internet. It is an absolute vacuum of browsing data and a key gateway to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

search and therefore ads shown via

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

search. Its ads business precedes everything else the company does in profit and importance, ergo Chrome is the second-most vital part of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. The ads business suffers a dire ***** without Chrome, and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

shrinks. That is the justice department’s goal.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

argues that divestiture would hurt US leadership in the tech industry; the justice department argues

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s monopolistic conduct hurts US leadership in the tech industry.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

may also be forced to sell off Android, the most popular smartphone operating system. Android is likewise a conduit for data used to sell ads. The ***** of Android would also be an enormous hit to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s business. The more interesting outcome in regard to Android would be the submission of the operating system to government oversight. What design decisions would a government committee make? It’d be fascinating to see the aesthetic qualities of a government-administered smartphone operating system. Two separate choice screens? Sweet suffering ******!

Without Chrome,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

would also lose the extremely valuable youth market. The tech giant’s Chromebooks are a low-cost item for schools that distribute laptops to students. Those laptops use Chrome OS, an operating system designed for web browsing and web-based tasks. Children introduced to one company’s products become accustomed to using them, and may seek out that company’s products as an ******. Apple has stated that training school-age users on its products can nurture a major pipeline of new customers.

Defaults are powerful, whether they appear as devices in schools or the search engine that appears in your browser’s address bar. Even if

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

succeeds in appealing the forced divestment of Chrome, it seems likely that the company will be compelled to end its at-least-$20bn deal with Apple to maintain its search engine as the default in the Safari browser.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s only concession, it seems from Walker’s blog post, is to say it would be fine with changes, perhaps even complete cancellations, to those agreements. Walker writes that the justice department could have proposed remedies related to “search distribution agreements” –

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s contracts with Firefox and the like. If even

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s chief legal officer is saying that he would have preferred changes to those agreements, it is reasonable to infer that he would have accepted those changes. The browser agreements are not long for this world. You, the product’s user, may find yourself tasked with choosing a default search engine for your iPhone’s browser. I would recommend trying something other than

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, perhaps the privacy-focused DuckDuckGo, just for fun. You can always switch back.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

will still be there, waiting for you.

Reviews

Elon ‘First Buddy’ Musk and his sidekick debut, Doge

Elon Musk and Donald Trump in October. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP

Several weeks ago, “First Buddy” Elon Musk and ******* presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy were formally appointed as the heads of the new Department of Government Efficiency. Doge, as Musk insists the department be called, is not part of the US government, but he has given it a gray checkmark on

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

/X, denoting that it is a “government or multilateral organization account”. Musk and Ramaswamy are, in effect, advisers to Trump. The House oversight committee is creating a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to work with them. It is mildly funny that a bureau dedicated to paring down bureaucracy requires two heads (and an assist of Marjorie Taylor Greene in the House).

In an essay in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, they lay out their vision for the nongovernmental government agency. They plan to work mostly by executive action, by Trump decree, forecasting that the ************* supreme court will agree with his moves. They talk vaguely of efficiencies at a high level – abstracted from specifics as much as possible. For instance: “A drastic reduction in federal regulations provides sound industrial logic for mass head-count reductions across the federal bureaucracy.” These are big words for: “We are going to roll back laws so we can conduct big layoffs. That will lower the government’s costs and increase how much each individual employee works.”

In the same style as Trump, they enumerate their enemies in the form of a cost-cutting list: the media, international cooperation (America first, after all), and liberals. They cite “$535 million a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting; $1.5billion for grants to international organizations to nearly $300 million to progressive groups like Planned Parenthood” as examples of what they would cut. In the same breath, they say ******* huge swathes of federal employees will not be political retaliation but instead will constitute only apolitical “reductions in force”. They also promise to require all employees to be in the office five days per week.

Musk has tried his damnedest to make Doge seem cutting-edge, but nothing, absolutely nothing, is less punk or ***** than federal spending policy.

He’ll need his gift for galvanizing if he’s to pull of Doge’s multibillion-dollar goals. The previous week, the world’s richest man asked for applications from “high-IQ revolutionaries” to his new endeavor. The perks? Long hours, “tedious work” (Elon’s own words) and no pay.

Musk and his sidekick’s understanding of government appears limited in their public statements, which is perhaps the point of their appointments but is also an obvious hindrance. He and Ramaswamy would like to cut all government programs that no longer have active congressional authorization. This idea makes basic logical sense. Yet, as one observer on X pointed out, such an action would ax healthcare for all US military veterans. The authorization for the Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Act expired in 1998. Doing so would undoubtedly be an enormous political mistake and highly unlikely to get approved, even if it did save taxpayers some $120bn.

Musk has been named Trump’s “secretary of cost-cutting”. If you’re wondering what his approach to cost-cutting has been in the past,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

has compiled a list of expenses he’s slashed at his menagerie of companies. Short version: His tactics worked well at SpaceX, less so at Tesla. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket costs $550m, whereas Nasa has projected the same spacecraft would cost the agency $4bn to build. At Tesla, Musk refused to use more expensive radar sensors for his cars’ full self-driving mode, opting instead for cameras. The US is now investigating the autonomous driving software’s role in a slew of fatal crashes.

Opt out: how to stop tech companies spying on your phone

Composite: The Guardian/Getty Images

***
Use encrypted messaging apps

Examples: Signal, Apple iMessage, WhatsApp,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Messages.

skip past newsletter promotion

A weekly ***** in to how technology is shaping our lives

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

reCaptcha to protect our website and the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

apply.

after newsletter promotion

Apple iMessage: This is also end-to-end encrypted when you’re talking to other people with iPhones and if you have advanced data protection turned on. Do that by going into settings, tapping on your Apple ID profile at the top, tapping on iCloud and scrolling down to the “advanced data protection” option and turning it on.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Messages: End-to-end encrypted conversations have “a banner that says: ‘RCS chat with [contact name or phone number]’” and “a lock on the send button when you compose a message”,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Disappear your messages: Encrypted messaging apps such as Signal and WhatsApp allow users to set messages to automatically be deleted after a certain ******* of time.

---

Auto-delete your data

Minimize how much data other apps and services are collecting about you and ensure that the data you do allow them to collect is being auto-deleted.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is the biggest holder of data about you. You can minimize how much data the company stores from your activity page at myactivity.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.com.

---

Turn off your location settings

Law enforcement is actively asking tech companies for location information or buying it. All it takes for you to protect yourself is a 15-minute review:

On iPhones, you can start by going into your settings and search for “location services” at the top.

On Android, start by going to your settings, then “security and privacy”, then “privacy controls”, then “permission manager” and select location.

Read the full how-to guide here.

The wider Techscape

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#TechScape #force #

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#sell #Chrome #Technology

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up