Bulldozers cannot be used as punishment tool: India court

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Bulldozers cannot be used as punishment tool: India court

India’s top court has said that authorities cannot demolish homes merely because a person has been accused of a ****** and has ***** down strict guidelines for any such action.

The ruling comes in response to a bunch of pleas seeking action against authorities using demolition as a punitive measure against those accused or convicted of *******.

“The executive [the government] cannot become a judge and demolish properties. The chilling sight of a bulldozer demolishing a building reminds one of lawlessness where might was right,” the Supreme Court said on Wednesday.

It also directed authorities to give sufficient time to the affected person to challenge the order or vacate the property.

The ruling comes in the backdrop of a spate of instances, where authorities in states, particularly governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have used demolition as a tool to punish people accused of *******.

The reason cited is ******** construction but experts have questioned the logic and say there is no legal justification for doing this.

While the victims include the families of Hindus, opposition leaders and several activists say that the action is mostly targeted at Muslims, especially after religious ********* or protests.

The BJP denies the allegation and chief ministers of these states have linked the demolitions with their tough stance on ******.

During the hearing on Wednesday, the Supreme Court used strong words to criticise the practice.

“Such highhanded and arbitrary actions have no place in a constitutional democracy,” it said, adding that officials “who took the law in their hands” should be held accountable.

The court then issued guidelines, which make it mandatory for authorities to give a 15-day notice to an occupant before the alleged ******** property is demolished.

The notice should explain the reasons for demolition. If the accused does not respond to the notice within 15 days, authorities can proceed with the action but they would be required to film the process, the court said.

It also warned that violating these guidelines would amount to contempt of court.

The court has strongly criticised extrajudicial demolitions throughout the trial.

Earlier this month, it observed that demolishing properties merely because a person was accused of a ****** was “simply unacceptable under rule of law”.

It also observed that citizens’ voices could not be silenced by the threat of demolition.

While the Supreme Court’s guidelines can be seen as a positive step towards preventing such demolitions from becoming the norm, observers point out that the implementation of the order would be key in ensuring the practice stops.

Leading human rights platform Amnesty International India has praised the ruling saying that though it has come late, it is a welcome move in upholding the rights of the people.

“This is a big win in ending the deeply unjust, widespread, unlawful and punitive demolitions, mostly targeting the ********* ******* community, by the Indian authorities which have often been peddled as ‘bulldozer justice’ by ruling party political leaders and media,” the organisation said in a statement.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Bulldozers #punishment #tool #India #court

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up