Why the ‘Housing First’ approach has struggled to fulfill its promise of ending homelessness

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Why the ‘Housing First’ approach has struggled to fulfill its promise of ending homelessness

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Over the past 15 years, the Housing First approach has gained traction as an evidence-based solution to tackling homelessness in many developed countries,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

The idea is simple: people experiencing homelessness should be given access to housing without any conditions.

Numerous studies have shown

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in reducing homelessness and providing

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, especially for people experiencing chronic homelessness. Yet, many countries still see rising levels of homelessness despite claiming to implement the approach.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

indicates that between 2018 and 2022 homelessness across the country increased by around 20%. The biggest contributor to that rise was unsheltered homelessness—people sleeping in streets, vehicles or encampments.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, the number of people experiencing homelessness jumped 12% between 2022 and 2023.

This raises important questions about the limitations of this globally popular homelessness approach.

What is Housing First?

The idea emerged from the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

founded in New York City in 1992. The program provided immediate housing through rental subsidies along with voluntary support services.

It emerged as an alternative to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

which require people to abstain from drugs and alcohol and adhere to treatment programs to become eligible for independent housing. That approach has generally ******* because it is extremely difficult for people to get treatment and recover from addiction if they don’t have stable housing. Many people also refuse to participate in treatment programs which make them ineligible for obtaining housing.

Housing First is seen as a better alternative because having a safe and permanent home provides a necessary foundation for addressing other needs. Rather than compelling people to treatment services, Housing First provides housing as quickly as possible and the choice to avail of supportive services.

Housing First has significantly evolved throughout the decades. It has received extensive evidence-based program evaluations, including the large $110 million cross-national Health Canada research project “At Home/Chez Soi.”

The current

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

claims to follow the principles of Housing First. Yet, despite its apparent success and global appeal, Housing First has not solved our national homelessness crisis.

In our

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, sociology professor

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and I identified three key reasons the approach has struggled to fulfill its promise of ending homelessness.

Elevating Housing First beyond a ‘program’

Housing First is popular because it is seen as a ready-made program that can be adopted by non-profits or government agencies. But treating it merely as a program overlooks whether there are the resources and political will to achieve its core principle—providing unhoused people with housing.

In both Canada and the U.S., Housing First programs often rely on

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. This creates challenges, as the rental subsidies provided typically do not cover high rent costs, and affordable housing is limited and often in poor condition.

For Housing First to truly succeed,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. It must be accompanied by investments in safe and stable affordable housing. It also requires tackling other systemic issues such as low social assistance rates, unlivable minimum wages and inadequate mental health resources.

Housing for all

Housing First is often promoted as a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

by targeting chronically homeless individuals who rely heavily on public services. A survey called the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is frequently used to identify and prioritize people for Housing First services. This survey asks people personal questions about their traumas, coping methods, fears, health issues, substance use and ********* justice involvement.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that this approach ranks people experiencing homelessness by their perceived cost to taxpayer dollars. This is evaluated by how often they have interacted with public services such as homeless shelters, hospitals, paramedics as well as the police.

This raises ethical concerns because access to housing is conditional on only those who incur the most cost to public dollars rather than housing being recognized as a basic human right for all.

Removing disciplinary measures

Although Housing First is supposed to give people a choice over the housing and support they receive, critics argue that it can be coercive. Many people living in homeless encampments

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, sometimes under police threats of eviction, arrest and dispossession of property.

Housing First assumes that everyone will prefer stable housing over life on the streets. However, this neglects the sense of community and security people might have developed after living with other unhoused people. Moving into housing could mean

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in a new living environment. For Housing First to be successful, it should resemble the sense of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that people forge living with others on the streets.

For those that do move into housing, they work with caseworkers who make routine home visits. In an effort to reduce potential tensions with landlords,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

on how to take care of their new home. When issues arise such as property damage or noise complaints, caseworkers use the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to get tenants to comply with the rental agreement.

Since many Housing First programs operate within a private rental market, the key role of caseworkers is to ensure landlord satisfaction to retain them as housing providers. Providing genuine support to tenants becomes secondary. Governments must provide non-market housing options for Housing First to reach its potential.

Finland’s experience with Housing First

Despite shortcomings, the principle behind Housing First (housing as a human right) ******** vital. This principle can still be realized through thoughtful reforms. Studies on Housing First provide a useful framework for addressing the systemic barriers that hinder its success.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

offers valuable lessons. Rather than treating Housing First as a standalone program, Finland has focused on ensuring a robust supply of secure, affordable housing. The government converted temporary shelters into long-term homes and made significant investments in social housing. In Helsinki, this led to a remarkable

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in people sleeping rough and in temporary accommodation.

Canada can draw from Finland’s example. Broadening the target population for Housing First beyond those chronically homeless and investing in social and supportive housing, rather than merely subsidizing market rents, is essential.

Furthermore, coercive tactics should not be used to compel people to live independently. Instead, service providers should meaningfully interact with the unhoused to create housing that suits their needs.

While Finland’s model is not without flaws, it demonstrates that tackling systemic issues is crucial for transforming homelessness policy. Housing First can still achieve its promise, but it requires a deeper commitment to social change.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
Why the ‘Housing First’ approach has struggled to fulfill its promise of ending homelessness (2024, November 7)
retrieved 7 November 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Housing #approach #struggled #fulfill #promise #homelessness

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up