Supreme Court to hear dispute involving Louisiana congressional map that includes two majority-Black districts

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Supreme Court to hear dispute involving Louisiana congressional map that includes two majority-****** districts

Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up a long-running redistricting dispute in Louisiana that could determine whether the state maintains a congressional map that includes two majority-****** districts after the 2024 election.

The court’s decision to hear the appeal from a group of ****** voters and the state marks at least the third time it will step into the legal battle over voting lines for Louisiana’s U.S. House districts that were drawn after the 2020 Census. The justices will hear arguments next year, with a decision expected by summer 2025.

The most recent congressional map, enacted in January after federal courts rejected earlier voting bounds, ******** in place for the upcoming election, as the Supreme Court in May gave the green light for it to be used this cycle.

A three-judge district court panel had blocked the state from using the newly drawn map in any upcoming election after finding it to be an unconstitutional ******* gerrymander. But the high court put that decision on hold.

The winding ****** over Louisiana’s congressional redistricting plan began in 2022, when *********** state lawmakers adopted a map consisting of five majority-White House districts and one majority-****** district even though roughly one-third of the state’s population is ******.

****** voters and civil rights groups successfully challenged the plan’s legality, arguing it diluted the voting strength of ********* residents in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Agreeing with the challengers, U.S. District Judge Shelly ***** blocked Louisiana from using the lines drawn in 2022 in any elections and gave state lawmakers the opportunity to draw a new map that included an additional majority-****** congressional district.

While the litigation was underway, the Supreme Court cleared the way for Louisiana to proceed with redrawing its congressional district lines, as ***** had ordered. A federal appeals court then set a Jan. 15 deadline for state lawmakers to craft a new redistricting plan with a second-majority ****** district.

Shortly after the state legislature convened for a special session to draw new lines, it adopted a map that lawmakers said satisfied the district court’s ruling and also achieved certain political objectives. The plan protects certain “pivotal” *********** incumbents,  according to GOP state senators, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Rep. Julia Letlow, the only woman in Louisiana’s congressional delegation.

But the new map changed the district of GOP Rep. Garret Graves, who backed Gov. Jeff Landry’s *********** opponent in the 2023 gubernatorial race and didn’t publicly support Scalise in his unsuccessful bid for House speaker.

Graves’ District 6 was reconfigured to create the second majority-********* district. It now stretches from Shreveport, in Louisiana’s northwest corner, to Baton Rouge, in the southeast, and connects predominantly ****** populations from Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette and Baton Rouge.

The new plan kicked off the challenge that is now before the Supreme Court, as a group of 12 “non-********-*********” voters argued it is a ******* gerrymander that violates the 14th Amendment. They

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

that the legislature engaged in “explicit, ******* segregation of voters and intentional discrimination” based on race and created two majority-****** districts without considering traditional redistricting criteria.

A divided three-judge district court panel sided with the voters and concluded that the map is an impermissible ******* gerrymander. That decision, though, was halted by the Supreme Court after Louisiana Republicans and ****** voters successfully

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the upcoming elections.

State GOP officials have lambasted the legal process that led them back to the high court again, lamenting in a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to the justices that they are “stuck in an endless game of ping-pong — and the state is the ball, not a player.”

They told the justices the litigation over the redistricting plan forced them into a “lose-lose situation” — the legislature had to consider race to remedy the Section 2 violation the lower courts identified in the first map from 2022, but in doing so, considered race too much, as the three-judge district court panel found when it evaluated the new voting lines.

“Cases like this illustrate that there is seemingly no end to the ********-by-litigation that States endure after every redistricting cycle,” the state *********** officials wrote in their filing.

The U.S. Supreme Court

More

More

Melissa Quinn

Melissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Supreme #Court #hear #dispute #involving #Louisiana #congressional #map #includes #majorityBlack #districts

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up