Australia’s secret history of Aboriginal population control in the 1960s

[Pelican Press 0]

Australia’s secret history of Aboriginal population control in the 1960s

Credit: The Conversation, CC BY-SA

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article may contain images of deceased people. It contains mentions of the Stolen Generations, and policies using outdated and potentially offensive terminology when referring to First Nations people.

The

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is celebrated for its promise that First Nations people of Australia would be counted. But when they were, many white experts decided the Aboriginal population was growing too fast—and took steps to stop this growth. This was eugenics in the late 20th century.

The costs were borne by Aboriginal women who faced covert government family-planning programs, designed ostensibly to promote “choice,” but ultimately to curb their fertility.

For decades, Indigenous communities have spoken of the coercive practices of officials and medical experts around birth control and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, and how they experienced them. Now historians are

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

in the government’s own records from as recently as the 1960s and ’70s.

The history of birth control is not just a story of women’s emancipation. Birth control has never been just about the rights of individual women to control their fertility. It has also been a tool of “experts” and authorities as they attempt to shape the population through the so-called “right kind” of *******. The birth of children of ******, children with disability or children born into ******** has, at various times, been considered by such “experts” as a problem to be managed.

Fighting to have and raise children

First Nations scholars such as

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

have resoundingly criticized the simple story of birth control as liberation. They argue that, while white women demanded contraception and *********, Aboriginal women have insisted on their right to have and raise their children.

Since colonization began, Aboriginal women have fought for this right. The Aboriginal population plummeted through the 19th century, through ******** and *********: it was a battle for survival.

Until the middle of the 20th century, white Australia largely presumed Aboriginal people were a “dying race”—and that all that could be done were attempts to “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

,” through missions and other “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

” policies. Later, these morphed into attempts to

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

those who survived into white Australia.

In the 1920s and ’30s in particular, many white Australians were preoccupied with the birth of so-called “half-caste” children, fearing they might undermine the possibility of a white Australia. Eugenic policies that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

between First Nations and non-Indigenous people attempted to prevent the birth of these children.

Most Australians are now familiar with the devastation caused by genocidal policies of child removal that resulted in the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. But fewer people know that eugenic practices seeking to limit Aboriginal populations continued even in the second half of the 20th century.

The growing Aboriginal population

When the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

were published in November 1967, they told a new story about the Aboriginal population: it was

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Further reports of population growth soon flowed in.

In August 1968,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

the Aboriginal birth rate was “twice the *********** average” and the “full-blood” birth rate would soon “equal or exceed the rate of the part-Aborigines.”

University of New South Wales ethno-psychiatrist

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

described an Aboriginal “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.” In his 1969 letter to the Courier Mail, professor of preventative medicine at the University of Queensland, John Francis, predicted an Aboriginal population of 360 million by 2200 if current birth rates continued.

Likewise, Jarvis Nye, a founder of the prestigious

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, described the “alarming situation in the quality of our young Australians.” He wrote that Aboriginal people were having “much larger families than our intelligent and provident ********* and ****** citizens.” Nye advocated providing “instruction in contraception” and free intrauterine devices (IUDs) and sterilization to Aboriginal people.

In 1969, alarm around the Aboriginal birth rate escalated into

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. Douglas Everingham, Member for Capricornia (and later minister for health in the Whitlam government), agreed the “aboriginal birth rate is excessive.” He suggested

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

These concerns focused, particularly, on Aboriginal

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, frequently presumed to be caused by a high birth rate. Academics Broom and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

found Aboriginal infant mortality was double that of white children. In central Australia, it was “

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.”

Nevertheless, they also noted that the Aboriginal population continued to rise despite high infant mortality. Concerned by the overall growth in the Aboriginal population (not simply by infant mortality), Francis criticized the provision of services to Aboriginal communities that reduced infant mortality without providing parallel measures to reduce fertility.

‘Family planning’ in remote communities

In July 1968, the Northern Territory Administration’s ******** Branch and the Health Department outlined their plans for Aboriginal women.

Historians are finding evidence of coercive practices of birth control and sterilisation in government records from the 1960s and 1970s. Credit: Maningrida, 1968. Dept of Lands Collection. Libraries and Archives NT.

Pilot projects would address the supposed “special problems” of family planning education “among unsophisticated Aboriginals in remote locations.” The minister warned this would be “sensitive.” He was aware of Aboriginal communities’ claims that family planning was, as he put it, “a white plot to wipe out the Aboriginal race.”

So “family planning” projects went quietly ahead under the Department of Health and the Northern Territory administration, with pilot projects on settlements and missions.

One began at Bagot in January 1968, with initial appointments for inserting IUDs. In 1968, a family planning “pilot project” was established at Warrabri Settlement. Another was established in 1969 at Bagot Hospital. The district ******** officer reported that at Bamyili (now Burunga) “of these, only two are socio-medical cases for whom some direct persuasion was made.”

The form of this “direct persuasion” is unclear, but it indicates Aboriginal women were directly encouraged to control their fertility if they did not make the “choice” the white officials wanted for them.

As for the method of contraception, the strong preference of practitioners and bureaucrats was IUDs. An IUD was long-lasting and crucially, it did not depend on correct daily use. Staff acknowledged the logistical difficulties of IUD insertion procedures in remote locations. The health professionals’ preference for IUDs came from their assumptions about Aboriginal women’s capacity and willingness, rather than from the women’s expressed preferences.

The Director for ******** in the Northern Territory,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

, assessed the success of the “family planning” projects by the percentage of the Aboriginal women who had adopted contraception—not by counting the proportion who had the opportunity to make an informed choice. Around 250 women out of 4,500 (5.5%) were participating in a family planning program by 1972.

What kind of ‘choice’?

So, did these women have a “choice” about their fertility? The government’s records give us little information on what these women understood about the medical procedures “recommended” to them. But these “recommendations” and “encouragements” were presented to women at a time when the Director of ******** still controlled intimate details of their daily lives.

These included where they worked, whether they could travel, who they married, where their children would be educated and—perhaps most significantly—whether they would retain custody of their children. All these decisions fell under the sweeping authority of the Director of ********.

Aboriginal women’s “choice” around fertility took place in a context where women did not have freedom to raise their children, where Aboriginal motherhood was routinely denigrated and where white “experts” spoke openly of “too many Aboriginal *******.”

In this context, we conclude that policies of family planning were coercive. But there is another, more hopeful, side to this story.

As this was happening, more and more Aboriginal people moved to cities and found opportunities to network, organize and become activists. Although governments turned to “family planning” services to curb the growth of the Aboriginal population, Aboriginal women found their own opportunities.

In the 1970s, Aboriginal leader Shirley Smith argued for government funding for family planning to be handled by the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

. This funding was increasingly transferred to the Aboriginal Medical Service throughout the 1970s. First Nations leaders such as Marcia Langton worked through the Aboriginal Medical Service to restore power and dignity to Aboriginal women.

Community-controlled health services have been a way for Aboriginal women to reassert control over their health decisions—and a powerful driver of First Nations self-determination.

What about today?

But where does the right of First Nations women to mother their children stand today?

Even now, the rates of First Nations children in out-of-home care are shocking: (

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

). We are witnessing a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

When First Nations women still make fertility decisions within a broader context of high rates of child removal and domestic ******, we must ask what kind of “choice” is available to them.

Given the long tail of eugenic and discriminatory policies in Australia, it is all the more important that First Nations people are able to access community-controlled health care reflecting

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

—especially when it comes to women’s health.

Health care for First Nations women, run by and for First Nations people, is the best context for women to be able to make their own fertility decisions.

Despite government efforts to slow the growth of the Indigenous population, we are seeing more people than ever identify as Indigenous—and the First Nations population is still growing. Australia is better for it.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

under a Creative Commons license. Read the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

Citation:
Australia’s secret history of Aboriginal population control in the 1960s (2024, April 12)
retrieved 12 April 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Australias #secret #history #Aboriginal #population #control #1960s

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

For verified travel tips and real support, visit: https://hopzone.eu/