Princess of Wales: Kate photo withdrawn by four news agencies amid ‘manipulation’ concerns

[Pelican Press 0]

Princess of Wales: Kate photo withdrawn by four news agencies amid ‘manipulation’ concerns

• By Thomas Mackintosh & Daniela Relph
• BBC News

10 March 2024

Updated 38 minutes ago

Image source, Prince of Wales

Four international photo agencies have retracted a picture of the Princess of Wales and her children over concerns it has been “manipulated”.

The image, taken by Prince William for Mother’s Day, was the first of Catherine to be released by Kensington Palace since her surgery in January.

But Getty Images, AFP, Reuters and Associated Press have pulled the photo – noting an “inconsistency in alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand”.

Kensington Palace declined to comment.

The photo shows the princess sitting down, surrounded by Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis and Prince George, the latter wrapping his arms around her.

It was the first official photo of the Princess of Wales since her abdominal surgery two months ago. Since then she has stayed out of the public eye.

The image was posted on the Prince and Princess of Wales’s social media accounts with a message from Catherine which said: “Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

“Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day.”

It has become a regular routine for the royal couple to release their own photos of special family occasions. More often than not, the photos are taken by Catherine and are issued to the media with instructions on how they can be used.

But, before Prince William’s image of his family was posted online, it would have gone through the social media team at Kensington Palace who manage the online accounts of the Prince and Princess of Wales.

It may well have been that some editing was done on the original photo which has now resulted in the discrepancies in its appearance.

The implication here is not that the entire photo is a fake or that the Princess of Wales is more unwell than she appears in the image. That seems unlikely and would be a very high-risk strategy from the Kensington Palace team.

The Mother’s Day image was included on the front pages of several national newspapers and websites, including BBC News, and used on TV news bulletins – again including the BBC.

In order to use the new photo as quickly as possible, the BBC took the one used by Kensington Palace on their social media accounts.

But, late on Sunday, the Associated Press, one of many international agencies that distributed the photo, issued a “***** notification” – an industry term used to make a retraction.

It said: “At closer inspection it appears that the source has manipulated the image. No replacement photo will be sent.”

A second news agency, Reuters, said it too had withdrawn the image “following a post-publication review”. This was followed by a third agency, AFP, which also issued a “mandatory ***** notice”.

Getty Images became the fourth organisation to retract the photograph.

PA Media, the ***’s biggest news agency – through which the Royal Family regularly releases its official information, including to the BBC – said it had not ******* the picture on its service.

But, a spokesman said the agency was seeking urgent clarification from Kensington Palace over the concerns raised about manipulation.

Image source, Prince of Wales/Kensington Palace

Most news organisations follow their own strict guidelines on the use of manipulated photographs, only using them when accompanied by an explanation that the image has been changed from the original.

News agencies, such as AP, therefore make a commitment to their clients that their photos are accurate and not digitally manipulated.

AP’s rules only allow “minor adjustments” in certain circumstances, including cropping and toning and colour adjustments, as well as the removal of dust on camera sensors. It says changes in density, contrast, colour and saturation levels “that substantially alter the original scene” are not acceptable.

Social media platform X has posted its own disclaimer on the Prince and Princess of Wales’s official account, saying the image is “believed to be digitally altered”.

At this stage, the more likely explanation is that some overzealous editing of the picture to get it ready for publication has actually cast doubt on its authenticity.

The photo, designed to cool the conversation around the Princess of Wales’s recovery, has instead heated all the rumours up again.

Royal photographer Ian Lloyd told BBC Breakfast that editing of photos was “not unusual”, saying: “It has gone on in photography, and royal photography particularly, since the dawn of photography.”

He pointed to the Prince and Princess of Wales’ Christmas card photo, released in December 2023, where Prince Louis “apparently had a finger missing” and there was “an extra leg”.

But he said the withdrawing of a photo “was definitely new”, saying: “Clearly somebody feels they have gone a step too far and they’ve withdrawn the photograph.”

Catherine, 42, spent 13 nights at the London Clinic, near Regent’s Park in central London, following the surgery.

The Palace has shared few details about her condition, which has garnered significant social media speculation, but has said it is not *******-related.

The team supporting the princess as she recovers is small and limited to those closest to her.

At the time of her stay, the Palace said the princess wanted her personal medical information to remain private, adding that she wanted to “maintain as much normality for her children as possible”.

The Palace said it would only provide updates on her recovery when there was significant new information to share.

It was thought on Sunday morning the photo would quell some of the more extreme theories around the princess’s absence from the public stage. But within hours social media was abuzz with zoomed-in images of Princess Charlotte’s left cuff and Prince Louis’ fingers.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Princess #Wales #Kate #photo #withdrawn #news #agencies #manipulation #concerns

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up