Oklahoma attorney general sees ‘travesty’ if US Supreme Court allows Glossip execution

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Oklahoma attorney general sees ‘travesty’ if US Supreme Court allows Glossip **********

By John Kruzel

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – When lawyers for Richard Glossip argue before the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to vacate his conviction for a 1997 *******, the Oklahoma ****** row inmate will have an unlikely ally: Gentner Drummond, the state’s *********** attorney general.

Although Drummond has taken ************* stances on issues from immigration to ********* to environmental regulation, the decorated former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot broke with fellow *********** state attorneys general in Glossip’s case after concluding prosecutors hid evidence that might have led to an acquittal.

“If he is *********, I believe that it will be a travesty of justice,” Drummond said in an interview.

Glossip, now 61, was convicted in 1998 of a *******-for-hire scheme. After an appeals court overturned that conviction based on ineffective defense counsel, Glossip again was found guilty of first-degree ******* in a 2004 retrial. Glossip is asking the Supreme Court to grant him a new trial after an Oklahoma court refused to overturn his conviction despite potentially exculpatory evidence being recently uncovered.

The decision by the Supreme Court, which begins its new term on Monday, is expected by the end of June.

Glossip was convicted of commissioning the ******* of Barry Van Treese, owner of the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City where Glossip was a manager. All parties agree Van Treese was beaten to ****** with a baseball bat by maintenance worker Justin Sneed. Sneed confessed to the ******* but avoided capital punishment by accepting a plea deal that involved testifying that Glossip paid him $10,000 to do it.

The victim’s family, represented by former federal judge Paul Cassell, filed a brief with the Supreme Court saying, “The truth here is that no evidence was suppressed and Glossip commissioned the ******* of Barry Van Treese.”

After taking office last year, Drummond began reviewing each of Oklahoma’s 28 then-pending ****** row cases. The veteran trial attorney saw hallmarks of a rock solid prosecution in nearly all these convictions: direct witnesses, corroborating witnesses and what he called “facts galore” indicating a defendant’s guilt.

But what he saw in Glossip’s case troubled him.

Securing a ******* conviction against Glossip hinged on the testimony of Sneed, who was a methamphetamine *******, and the reliability of his account. Glossip admitted to helping Sneed cover up the ******* after it occurred, but denied knowing that Sneed planned to ***** Van Treese or encouraging him to do so.

“The state’s witness was the *********, and he was endorsed for the ****** penalty until he turned state’s evidence and said, ‘Oh, not me, but Mr. Glossip – he’s the mastermind,'” Drummond said. “That struck me as very odd.”

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION

Drummond commissioned an independent investigation and disclosed information – including a prosecutor’s hand-written notes from a meeting with Sneed – that had been withheld from Glossip’s lawyers.

The new information cast doubt on Sneed’s credibility, Glossip’s lawyers said. They contend they were kept in the dark about Sneed receiving psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorder immediately after his arrest, and that prosecutors ******* to correct a false statement Sneed made about his prescription for the medication lithium.

These revelations led Drummond to reach a momentous conclusion: If prosecutors had given defense lawyers all the exculpatory evidence they possessed, as required by law, then Glossip might have been acquitted.

“I don’t believe Mr. Glossip was given a fair trial,” Drummond said.

Glossip’s case is not the first time Drummond has pushed back against an order to *****.

In 1991, while flying an F-15 Eagle in a nighttime operation during the U.S.-led Persian Gulf War against Iraq, Drummond disobeyed three direct orders to ***** a missile at an aircraft that had been identified as hostile. Facing anti-aircraft artillery ***** and low fuel, then-Captain Drummond insisted on personally confirming that the aircraft was an ****** before ********* it down.

Drummond was later awarded the U.S. Distinguished Flying Cross for identifying the jet as an allied Saudi aircraft and withholding *****. His 1991 military citation said his actions had “prevented the tragic loss” of allied forces’ lives.

In Glossip’s case, Drummond showed “an unusual amount of courage” by asking the Supreme Court to halt Glossip’s ********** and grant him a new trial, said Robin Maher, executive director of the ****** Penalty Information Center nonprofit group.

“It’s impossible to overstate just how extraordinary it is,” Maher said.

Drummond’s support, Maher added, may be the reason why the Supreme Court chose to halt Glossip’s ********** and hear his case rather than ******* it, as typically happens when ****** row inmates appeal.

Because Oklahoma’s attorney general is supporting Glossip’s appeal, the Supreme Court had to take the rare step of tapping an outside lawyer – private attorney Christopher Michel – to argue that Glossip’s conviction should be upheld.

Michel in his Supreme Court brief, among other things, sought to rebut the claim by Glossip’s lawyers that the newly disclosed information undermined Sneed’s credibility or the prosecution’s handling of the case.

Drummond’s maverick streak has put him at odds with *********** attorneys general from eight states who urged the justices to clear the way for Glossip’s **********. He previously bucked fellow Republicans in Oklahoma by successfully suing on constitutional grounds to block the first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in the ******* States.

Drummond said he did not weigh any possible political risks for backing Glossip, such as being painted by opponents as soft on ******.

“If that means I’m never elected again, then I can go to my grave being satisfied that I did the right thing,” Drummond said.

Drummond believes Glossip’s role in covering up Van Treese’s ******* makes him at least an “accessory after the fact,” justifying a long prison sentence. But Glossip’s ******* conviction was too flawed for Drummond to defend.

“Oklahomans deserve to have absolute ****** that the ****** penalty is administered fairly and with certainty,” Drummond said.

Drummond said he feels duty-bound to attend executions to honor victims and their families, and the memory of those put to ******. Seven times as attorney general he has sat four feet (1.2 meters) away as an inmate strapped to a gurney was administered a lethal injection.

Drummond said he will enforce whatever judgment the Supreme Court makes concerning Glossip, even if it means supervising an ********** he believes to be wrong.

“I feel strongly that my position is correct,” Drummond said. “But if a majority on the Supreme Court says otherwise, I will be in the ****** chamber with Mr. Glossip.”

(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Oklahoma #attorney #general #sees #travesty #Supreme #Court #Glossip #**********

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up