First Intel Xeon W-3500 review lands with shocking realization — Intel excels at scientific computing and ML, but lags desperately everywhere else

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

First Intel Xeon W-3500 review lands with shocking realization — Intel excels at scientific computing and ML, but lags desperately everywhere else

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.



Credit: Intel

Puget Systems has published a

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

of the Intel Xeon W-3500 series. The company’s latest workstation processors are an update of the W-3400 series, offering increased core counts and cache but maintaining the core architecture. This new chips aim to address Intel’s lagging performance in the high-end desktop (HEDT) content creation space compared to AMD’s Threadripper series.

Puget Systems had a full retail sample of the high-end Xeon w9-3595X but used pre-production samples for other models, meaning real-world performance might vary slightly. For consistency, benchmarking used standardized setups, ensuring RAM speed and cooling factors were controlled.

In

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

After Effects, an application benefiting from multicore CPUs, Intel’s processors showed some performance improvements, although AMD’s Threadripper held the lead. Similarly, the Xeon processors showed only incremental gains in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve, with Threadripper still leading in single-threaded and multi-core performance.

Showing some gains

For video editing and motion graphics, the Xeons performed respectably but ******* to surpass AMD’s offerings. Specifically, Premiere Pro showed minor improvements, while the RAW codec performance was positive. DaVinci Resolve further highlighted AMD’s dominance, although Intel resolved previous issues with odd core count models underperforming.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Photoshop tests confirmed that these high-core count processors weren’t the best choice due to the application’s latency sensitivity and single-core reliance. AMD’s Threadripper dominated here as well.

In Unreal Engine tests and CPU rendering benchmarks (Cinebench, V-Ray, Blender), the Xeons showed some gains, particularly in Blender with a 10-15% improvement. However, AMD’s higher-core models were faster, completing tasks notably quicker.

:image/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Blender benchmarks Intel Xeon W-3500

Summing up

At the end of its review, Puget Systems said, “The new Intel Xeon W-3500 family of processors is a fine refresh to an existing product stack but leaves a lot to be desired if Intel wants to compete with AMD in the HEDT space for Content Creation. As is typical, the performance gain depends a lot on the particular application, but, in general, gains are from 0-20% with a bias towards multi-threaded applications due to the increased core count.”

Puget noted that while it didn’t test the new chips for scientific computing and HPC/ML applications in this review (as the focus was on content creation) this is one area where the Intel Xeon W-3500 series will shine and it plans run a comparison for that in the future.

More from TechRadar Pro

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#Intel #Xeon #W3500 #review #lands #shocking #realization #Intel #excels #scientific #computing #lags #desperately

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up