CMA: AWS and Google slam Microsoft for claiming its cloud licensing tactics are not harming them

[Pelican Press 0]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

CMA: AWS and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

slam

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

for claiming its cloud licensing tactics are not harming them

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

has sought to discredit claims that its two biggest public cloud rivals –

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

– are being competitively disadvantaged by its controversial licensing tactics, in a submission to the *** competition watchdog’s cloud market probe.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published summary details on 16 September 2024 from separate evidence-gathering sessions it conducted with

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Web Services (AWS),

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

back in July to inform the findings of its anti-trust probe into the *** cloud infrastructure services market.

All three submissions respectively contain feedback from the public cloud giants about the areas the CMA has focused its investigation into the prevalence of anti-competitive behaviour in the *** cloud market.

These include looking into whether the offering of committed spend discounts, the charging of data egress fees and the presence of interoperability issues are having a dampening impact on the *** cloud infrastructure services market’s competitiveness.

In addition to this, the CMA has also been investigating complaints about the anti-competitive impact of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s cloud licensing practices, following accusations that it charges customers more for running its software in its competitors’ clouds.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

has also been similarly accused of charging customers more for opting to run software made by other IT providers in its

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Azure public cloud.

As previously reported by Computer Weekly,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

maintains its licensing tactics are having no impact on how much business AWS or

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

are winning in the public cloud market, which is a view it reiterated during its July 2024 summary hearing with the CMA.

‘Ample margin’ to compete

The company said in its summary hearing document that its licensing fees “do not materially raise costs for its competitors” and do not negatively impact on their business because AWS and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

have “ample margin” to compete with Azure.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

referred to AWS and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

as “listed providers” that provide an “important marketing channel” for the company, because of the ability for customers to run its software in their clouds.

The document went on to state that both firms’ financial results are proof that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s actions are not harming their business.

“It is difficult for

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

to argue that they cannot afford to pay for its licenses, or that

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

is foreclosing them, when looking at their growth and profits,” the summary document stated. “Licensing fees are not material for

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

as they are a small cost relative to their total cloud revenues.”

As further proof that its licensing practices are not negatively impacting on either company in any way,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

said neither firm has had their ability to “invest and remain competitive” affected by how it licenses its software for use within competing clouds.

“AWS has not slowed down its investments and its investments in [research and development] was the largest of the hyperscalers in previous years,” the document added.

Unsurprisingly,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

have both disputed

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s take on the impact its licensing practices are having on their respective businesses, with AWS appearing to suggest that it is their ****** customers who are suffering financially as a result – not the cloud providers themselves.

In its submission, AWS said

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s actions are the source of customer complaints, because its licensing practices are “artificially imposed” limits on where they can run software they own that could – in

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s view – be easily remedied.

“Since 2019, there have been licensing restrictions imposed by

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

preventing customers from using previously purchased

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

licenses on AWS … [and] this has had huge financial consequences for customers,” the AWS submission stated. “Customers buying

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

products should have access to them forever and should be able to use it on the IT provider of their choice.

“AWS … receives complaints from customers regarding

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s licensing restrictions and their inability to run the software on their cloud of choice.”

Losing business

In its submission,

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

said abiding by the terms of

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s Services Provider License Agreement (SPLA) had resulted in it losing business, separate to the fact its contents means it’s more expensive to run

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

workloads on its cloud compared with Azure.

“There a a number of non-price restrictions in the SPLA … that mean [

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

] cannot compete with Azure,” the

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

document stated. “[

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

] is not able to provide certain security updates to customers, which has resulted in lost business.”

The company also shared details of the difficulties customers face, from a legacy software point of view, when trying to leave

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and how this situation could be contributing to instances of customers becoming locked-in to its systems.

“It is not simple for customers to rewrite legacy applications to move away from

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

and part of the reason why there are so many legacy systems that have been running on

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

’s software for many years is because they are very complex and cost prohibitive to rewrite,” said

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

.

“When customers ‘lift and shift’ legacy

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

workloads to Azure, many smaller companies cannot afford to rewrite those workloads and it becomes difficult to migrate them away from Azure – so they are locked in.”

CMA is far from the first organisation to investigate

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

over its cloud licensing tactics, as the matter has been the focus of studies and other anti-competitive investigations, conducted by regulators and watchdogs in other parts of the world too. 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#CMA #AWS #

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#slam #

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

#claiming #cloud #licensing #tactics #harming

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up