Jump to content
  • Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Fining big polluters can reduce environmental damage, but only if the fines match the crimes


Recommended Posts

  • Diamond Member



Fining big polluters can reduce environmental damage, but only if the fines match the *******

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Some of Canada’s biggest employers have a poor track record of abiding by environmental laws. When laws are broken corporate leaders don’t go to prison; instead, the company is fined. But the fines are rarely severe enough to scare them into changing their ways, let alone enough to make companies repair environmental damage or build a cleaner future.

Everyone has seen the headlines over the years:

This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
. The combined value of these three companies—
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
(******’s parent corporation)—is over $75 billion.

Monetary penalties for breaking environmental laws

This is the hidden content, please
. Yet, many companies are failing to maintain compliance and pollution continues to flow. This is
This is the hidden content, please
.

Protecting water

Canada has an abundance of renewable surface water and groundwater—a

This is the hidden content, please
that often gets taken for granted. Despite persistent challenges with drinking water insecurity and climate-induced water stress, water access in Canada is a privilege that many other regions of the world do not have.

Water pollution from natural resource extraction can hinder economic drivers like

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
,
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
.

How fines are issued

There are two main options for fining big polluters: administrative penalties or court charges.

Administrative penalties proceed more quickly and have historically been used for relatively small fines. Several provinces including British Columbia and Ontario have recently upped maximum penalties to

This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
respectively for corporations, depending on what law is broken.

Court charges are more common when federal law—such as the Fisheries Act—is also involved. Court convictions carry more social weight, allow for much ******* fines and threaten jail time. However, they can also take years and spending time in prison for harming the environment is an

This is the hidden content, please
.

Flexibility in fine amounts and bogged down court systems have resulted in administrative penalties increasingly being favored by regulators. For example, these penalties were nearly

This is the hidden content, please
than court charges for industrial pollution under the B.C. Environmental Management Act from 2017 to 2022.

For many businesses, a hefty one-off fine for breaking an environmental law is an unsettling wake up call. Responsible employers reflect on this seriously and take tangible steps to reduce the chance of their operations harming the environment in the future.

But for wealthy repeat offenders, fines may be treated as nothing more than the

This is the hidden content, please
. This is where the problem *****, and some of Canada’s richest corporations prove it.






A report on the Elk Valley contaminants spill produced by the CBC.

Repeat water polluters in recent history

Teck Resources has been fined

This is the hidden content, please
, and
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
for contaminating rivers and harming endangered fish in the Elk Valley, B.C. with toxic mining run-off from five nearby coal projects. The company has also been
This is the hidden content, please
for toxic spills and leaks into the Columbia River from its nearby zinc and lead smelter.

The cost of these infractions has come to

This is the hidden content, please
. While this may seem a hefty sum, it equals just 0.02 percent of Teck’s
This is the hidden content, please
dollar profits in 2023 alone.

In Québec, Rio Tinto has been fined

This is the hidden content, please
on
This is the hidden content, please
for ********
This is the hidden content, please
into rivers from its smelters and refineries. The company’s market cap is
This is the hidden content, please
.

Oil giant Suncor Energy—

This is the hidden content, please
in 2023 earnings—has a history of repeatedly polluting the Athabasca River with
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
, in addition to
This is the hidden content, please
and
This is the hidden content, please
during seabed drilling in offshore Newfoundland. None of Suncor’s fines related to water contamination has
This is the hidden content, please
.

Scroll through any of these big polluters’ websites and you’ll find

This is the hidden content, please
to sustainability and caring for the environment. But actions speak louder than words, and no amount of greenwashing lingo can erase the smears from a record of chronic non-compliance with environmental laws.

Serious policy changes to better protect water—

This is the hidden content, please
—from repeat environmental offenders are warranted.

Potential paths forward

Laws work to protect the environment when they are

This is the hidden content, please
. Amendments to the Clean Air Act in the ******* States in 1990 pushed polluters to innovate and resulted in a
This is the hidden content, please
over the following 20 years despite a 33 percent increase in manufacturing output.

Mimicking the successful regulatory overhauls of the past is no guarantee of success today. Still, there are several paths forward to reduce environmental degradation from natural resource extraction that are worth considering:

  1. A new tier should be added to environmental laws with no maximum penalty, only applying to companies with a current market cap over a certain threshold—perhaps a billion dollars. This new penalty class would meaningfully punish the wealthiest of polluters without infringing on responsible actors.
  2. Court prosecutions should be favored over administrative penalties because they allow for ******* fines and posting to the
    This is the hidden content, please
    which attract more public attention. Threats of public shaming and heftier penalties may spur environmental action from
    This is the hidden content, please
    .
  3. Stop-work orders and revoking operating permits through sanctions are
    This is the hidden content, please
    but should occur
    This is the hidden content, please
    . Recent efforts, like
    This is the hidden content, please
    due to water contamination issues,
    This is the hidden content, please
    from a polluter and forces clean up before shovels resume digging.

The importance of healthy water systems to Canadians cannot be overstated—it is time to get serious about how this resource is protected.

A wider problem

It’s too early to know the

This is the hidden content, please
of the Baltimore bridge collapse. What is clear, however, is that while corporate entities look to
This is the hidden content, please
, the ********* public will
This is the hidden content, please
.

This most recent disaster is not unlike the

This is the hidden content, please
sitting on ********* taxpayers from a 2014 tailings dam ******** at the Mount Polley Mine that spilled 24 million cubic meters of toxic waste into Fraser River salmon habitat. The company (Imperial Metals) was
This is the hidden content, please
for the incident.

From Baltimore to the Fraser River, financial penalties to those who damage our environments remain pitifully low. Only by holding polluters truly to account can we effectively work to end environmental pollution both in Canada and around the world.

Provided by
The Conversation


This article is republished from

This is the hidden content, please
under a Creative Commons license. Read the
This is the hidden content, please
.

Citation:
Fining big polluters can reduce environmental damage, but only if the fines match the ******* (2024, April 8)
retrieved 8 April 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.







This is the hidden content, please

Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science
#Fining #big #polluters #reduce #environmental #damage #fines #match #*******

This is the hidden content, please

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Vote for the server

    To vote for this server you must login.

    Jim Carrey Flirting GIF

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

Privacy Notice: We utilize cookies to optimize your browsing experience and analyze website traffic. By consenting, you acknowledge and agree to our Cookie Policy, ensuring your privacy preferences are respected.