Diamond Member Pelican Press 0 Posted September 6, 2024 Diamond Member Share Posted September 6, 2024 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Alaska governor vetoes expanded birth control access as a judge strikes down ********* limits JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — In competing developments about reproductive rights in the nation’s largest state, Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to expand birth control access while a This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up decades-old restrictions on who could perform abortions. The *********** governor’s veto Wednesday stunned supporters of the measure, which would have forced insurance companies to cover up to a year’s supply of birth control at a time, something considered especially important in providing access in distant rural communities. The This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up overwhelmingly passed the state Legislature this year: 29-11 in the ***********-controlled House and 16-3 in the Senate, which has bipartisan leadership. It was not opposed by insurance companies, supporters noted. But in an emailed statement, Dunleavy spokesperson Jeff Turner said he vetoed it because “contraceptives are widely available, and compelling insurance companies to provide mandatory coverage for a year is bad policy.” Supporters of the bill said the veto would keep barriers in place that make it difficult to access birth control in much of the state, including villages only accessible by plane, and for Alaska patients on Medicaid, which limits the supply of birth control pills to one month at a time. “Governor Dunleavy’s veto of HB 17, after eight years of tireless effort, overwhelming community support, and positive collaboration with the insurance companies, is deeply disappointing,” said Democratic Rep. Ashley Carrick, the bill’s sponsor. “There is simply no justifiable reason to veto a bill that would ensure every person in Alaska, no matter where they live, has access to essential medication, like birth control.” Meanwhile Wednesday, Alaska Superior Court Judge Josie Garton found unconstitutional a state law that said only a doctor licensed by the State Medical Board can perform an ********* in Alaska. Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up in 2019, saying advanced practice clinicians — which include advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants — should also be allowed to perform medication or aspiration abortions. Such clinicians already perform procedures that are “comparably or more complex” than medication ********* or aspiration, such as delivering ******* and removing and inserting intrauterine contraceptive devices, the lawsuit said. Those care providers help fill a void in the largely rural state where some communities lack regular access to doctors, according to the group’s lawsuit. Garton in 2021 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to allow advanced practice clinicians to provide medication ********* pending her decision in the underlying case. The Alaska Supreme Court has interpreted the right to privacy in the state’s constitution as encompassing ********* rights. In her ruling Wednesday, Garton found that the law violated the privacy and equal protection rights of patients by burdening their access to *********, as well as the rights of clinicians qualified to perform the procedures. The restrictions have a disproportionate impact on people who are low-income, have inflexible work schedules or have limited access to transportation, the judge noted. “There is … no medical reason why ********* is regulated more restrictively than any other reproductive health care,” such as medical treatment of miscarriages, Garton wrote. Women, particularly in rural Alaska, have to fly to larger cities, such as Anchorage, Juneau or even Seattle, for ********* care because of the limited availability of doctors who can provide the service in the state, or sometimes women wait weeks before they’re seen by a doctor, according to the lawsuit. The judge found that there was no reliable statistical evidence to show that the law affected patients’ ability to access abortions in a timely manner. But, she wrote, the question was whether it increased barriers to care, and it did. In an emailed statement, Chief Assistant Attorney General Chris Robison said the state is reviewing the decision. “The statute was enacted to ensure medical safety, and those types of judgments are more appropriately made by the Legislative or Executive branches of government,” Robison said. Advanced practice clinicians can provide ********* care in about 20 states, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports ********* rights. In two of those states — New Mexico and Rhode Island — the care is limited to medication abortions. In California, certain conditions must be met, such as the clinician providing care during the first trimester, under a doctor’s supervision and after undergoing training, according to the organization. ___ Johnson reported from Seattle. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up #Alaska #governor #vetoes #expanded #birth #control #access #judge #strikes #********* #limits This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Link to comment https://hopzone.eu/forums/topic/119338-alaska-governor-vetoes-expanded-birth-control-access-as-a-judge-strikes-down-abortion-limits/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now