Diamond Member Pelican Press 0 Posted October 27 Diamond Member Share Posted October 27 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Qualcomm’s 8-Core Snapdragon X Plus, Tested: A Competitive, Cheaper Chip PCMag editors select and review products This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up .  In the year since Qualcomm unveiled its This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , two concerns have undermined their promise of an This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up -esque combination of long battery life and high performance. One has been compatibility with Windows apps and drivers written for AMD and Intel processors— This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up at the Snapdragon Summit this week. Another has been cost, with This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up starting at relatively high prices. Qualcomm took one step toward addressing that second concern when it introduced the cheaper Snapdragon X Plus series of chips, first in This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and now in a still more affordable This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . :image/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw== Laptops based on this branch of the Snapdragon X family tree are starting to arrive at considerably cheaper prices. For example, Lenovo’s lineup This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . But what kind of performance can you expect from Qualcomm’s cheaper Snapdragon X Plus eight-core chips? Testing Eight-Core Snapdragon X Plus’ Mettle Back at This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , Qualcomm hosted a benchmarking session for journalists to give them a sense of the cheaper X Plus’s performance. The company provided a set of Asus Vivobook S 15 ($839.99 as tested) laptops, each running on a Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 processor representing the low end of the This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up (PDF). The laptops were set up with a suite of benchmarking apps, and journalists were then allowed to run those apps as they saw fit. The major takeaway, as you can see in the charts below comparing the Vivobook S 15 with a few peer systems running Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm chips, is that the eight-core X Plus provides a reasonable less-for-less trade-off that should draw people who buy laptops with price and battery life, not raw speed, foremost in mind. The results we saw (which matched the tests Qualcomm had run in advance on these laptops and shared with the press) show visible but tiny drops in performance relative to the Snapdragon X Elite. They also show the cheaper chip besting Intel’s previous-generation Meteor Lake laptop chip and, in places, AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 Series. For example, in Cinebench 2024, the Asus X Plus laptop’s multi-core render score edged out an This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ($1,499.99 as tested) running a Core Ultra 7 155H and an This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ($1,699.99 as tested) with an AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series but fell considerably short of a This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ($999.99 as tested) powered by a Snapdragon X Elite. It also outpaced a new-model Intel “Lunar Lake” Core Ultra 7 by a big margin, due in big part to that line’s dropping of thread-doubling Hyper-Threading with these new Intel chips. Another way to look at these results, especially if you are reading this on a laptop that’s two or more years old: A machine with an eight-core X Plus chip should feel dramatically faster than your current system. For example, the Asus laptop’s score in the Speedometer in-browser benchmark is more than double the 10.4 points I recorded on the 13th Gen Core i7 laptop on which I’m writing this post, an This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . What These Tests Tell (and Don’t Tell) About Snapdragon X Plus’ Future But it’s also important to call out two observations that don’t appear in those stats. One is that the testing process itself revealed some compatibility problems: GFXBench crashed twice until I remembered to select the Qualcomm PR-specified test of Aztec Ruins Vulkan. At the same time, the UL Procyon suite couldn’t run one of the default tests, AI Computer Vision. Non-technical users don’t run benchmarking apps more complicated than This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up , so those glitches should not represent a genuine concern for most people. But they do suggest the enormity of the task This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and Qualcomm are undertaking in making Windows an operating system that coexists on two separate processor architectures. ( This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up on the state of Windows on Arm’s emulation layer, Prism.) The other observation came via my fingertips, not my eyes: Even as these benchmarking apps had the Snapdragon X Plus chip cranking away in extended, processor-intensive tasks like video rendering, the Vivobook laptop stayed cool the whole time. This is particularly important for portability and overall system longevity. These early benchmark results, albeit from one laptop in a single configuration, preview a computing experience from eight-core Snapdragon X Plus that will generally keep pace with comparably equipped and priced systems—not to mention laptops twice its price, in some cases. That’s a promising position to be in for Qualcomm, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up or not. ( This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up : IFA’s organizers covered most of my travel costs and those of other invited US journalists and analysts.) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up #Qualcomms #8Core #Snapdragon #Tested #Competitive #Cheaper #Chip This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Link to comment https://hopzone.eu/forums/topic/155031-qualcomm%E2%80%99s-8-core-snapdragon-x-plus-tested-a-competitive-cheaper-chip/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now